HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #681  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2020, 7:32 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,380
Toyota is the sick man of the automotive world.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #682  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2020, 7:59 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 24,438
The biggest case for argument HFCEVs was that you could fill up in 5 mins, just like gas. Between more powerful chargers and better batteries that can take higher charging rates, that advantage is really starting to disappear.

Since most EVs are charged as a concurrent activity (sleeping, bathroom break, etc), they don't even need 5 min charging to be competitive. Inside of 15-20 mins for 100% would practically crush the competition. But nobody is aiming that low. Here's BP saying they expect 100% in 5 mins to be capable by 2021:

https://thedriven.io/2019/07/29/oil-...nutes-by-2021/

Hydrogen has a very strong case to be made because of energy density. But commercialization requires the kind of investment we're seeing on batteries. And none of its proponents seem all that interested in actually putting their money where their mouths are.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #683  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2020, 8:39 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 21,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
The biggest case for argument HFCEVs was that you could fill up in 5 mins, just like gas. Between more powerful chargers and better batteries that can take higher charging rates, that advantage is really starting to disappear.

Since most EVs are charged as a concurrent activity (sleeping, bathroom break, etc), they don't even need 5 min charging to be competitive. Inside of 15-20 mins for 100% would practically crush the competition. But nobody is aiming that low. Here's BP saying they expect 100% in 5 mins to be capable by 2021:

https://thedriven.io/2019/07/29/oil-...nutes-by-2021/

Hydrogen has a very strong case to be made because of energy density. But commercialization requires the kind of investment we're seeing on batteries. And none of its proponents seem all that interested in actually putting their money where their mouths are.
Back in the 90s, when H2 Fuel Cells were having some breakthroughs, they looked like a realistic future for vehicles of all sizes. BEVs were things like golf carts and the GM EV1. Despite the conspiracy theories around that car, it wasn't too practical, but a great proof of what is possible.

Flash forward with ~25 years of battery development (thanks Apple!) for phones, laptops, and various portable electronics. Suddenly we have a battery chemistry and cost that's much more workable for electric cars. Tesla and others begin to pour money into this, and here we are.

Meanwhile fuel cells have languished. Hydrogen remains expense, and prohibitively so if we want to produce it cleanly. The compression required to have it provide a fuel cell with a decent range is incredible, putting CNG to shame.

The technology hasn't advanced much, the price is still high, and the fuel cells require a ton of rare earth material as well. Any economies of scale are unclear.

I do think hydrogen has a future replacing some of the natural gas we use now for heating. It can get slipstreamed into existing natural gas pipelines, so I've read. If electricity gets super cheap with solar, it's a great use for excesses generated during the day.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #684  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2020, 9:13 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 24,438
The other issue for hydrogen is the cost of fueling. It's ridiculously expensive.

Quote:
Hydrogen fuel prices range from $12.85 to more than $16 per kilogram (kg), but the most common price is $13.99 per kg (equivalent on a price per energy basis to $5.60 per gallon of gasoline), which translates to an operating cost of $0.21 per mile......At $3.50 per gallon gasoline, a conventional vehicle costs about $0.13 per mile to operate, while an FCEV using $8 per kg hydrogen fuel would cost about $0.12 per mile.
https://cafcp.org/content/cost-refill

So basically, you're swapping one expensive fuel for another. The Japanese and Koreans just don't want to admit they got caught napping and bet on the wrong horse.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #685  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2020, 11:01 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 22,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFUVancouver View Post
Toyota is the sick man of the automotive world.
I'd say that title is reserved for Nissan right now.

Toyota is playing a fairly pragmatic game going for hybrids rather than pure electric. I'm just disappointed we're not getting more PHEVs in North America. Something that has 50km of electric range, yet still has a gas motor would be perfect for me and I expect millions of Canadians. Lexus has the ES300h but the front of all Toyota products have been hit with the ugly stick, and I'm not a fan of the busy, button-heavy interiors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #686  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2020, 12:26 AM
accord1999 accord1999 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
But nobody is aiming that low. Here's BP saying they expect 100% in 5 mins to be capable by 2021:

https://thedriven.io/2019/07/29/oil-...nutes-by-2021/
BP seems to be writing a check that its acquired battery developer can't cash:

Quote:
To date, StoreDot have demonstrated their li-ion tech works for mobile phones and electric scooters, with plans to start selling five minute chargers for mobile phones by mid-2020.

At a recent demonstration in Tel Aviv in June, StoreDot’s tech added charged the flat battery of an electric scooter in 5 minutes, showing that the tech can also be used for larger applications.
Is BP suggesting 0-100% in 5 minutes? For a largish 60 kWh battery, that requires an average charging rate of more than 700 kW. Li-ion batteries' ability to accept power decreases as it fills, so it would actually require 1+ MW peak rates early on.

And how many times could the battery be charged at such a rate without suffering damage? Heat and high amperage are detrimental to the health of li-ion batteries. You might be able to do it for a perfectly controlled demo once or twice (and then throw out the battery), but what about the typical lifespan of a car?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #687  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2020, 12:33 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 24,438
Whether it's BP or someone else. Faster Charging is coming. Especially as graphene catches on for batteries. Also, I'm going to say it doesn't strictly have to be 5 mins. I live in a condo. If I had to go charge somewhere else to charge. I'd be okay with 15 mins while I have a coffee at Tim's once a week or while at the grocer. The key is to enable charging concurrently, doing something else that I like to do or have to do. Incidentally, 10-15 mins is also the length of my single stop when driving to Toronto. But even if it's dead boring and I have nothing to do, at those times, I'd just sit in my car plugged in. Don't even have to stand outside with the car not running, like I do while pumping gas.

For a 100 kWh battery, only need a 400 kW charger to fill in 15 mins. And 600 kW charger in 10 min. I'm going to say batteries and chargers capable of this will be here shortly even if it takes a few years to proliferate.

The Electrify Canada chargers at 350 kW are already pretty close:

https://www.electrify-canada.ca/about-ev-charging

Theoretically, 17 mins to fill up 100 kWh.

And since most folks aren't going to zero to 100%, I suspect the actual charge times are probably less than 15 mins on average, even with the tapering off at the end.

Last edited by Truenorth00; Feb 15, 2020 at 12:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #688  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2020, 12:42 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 24,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
I'm just disappointed we're not getting more PHEVs in North America.
Battery prices are dropping so fast that in the 5 year design cycle for most automakers, a BEV might end up cheaper than a PHEV.

Given how behind Toyota is, I expect them to announce all their cars will be plug ins. Just to try and hold off the competitions long enough to switch their strategy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #689  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2020, 4:03 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 21,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Battery prices are dropping so fast that in the 5 year design cycle for most automakers, a BEV might end up cheaper than a PHEV.

Given how behind Toyota is, I expect them to announce all their cars will be plug ins. Just to try and hold off the competitions long enough to switch their strategy.
Toyota has been "hybridizing" their entire lineup. People were begging for more electric only range, and finally they started producing a plug-in Prius in greater numbers. Now they are introducing a plug-in Rav4 (no brainer IMO).

It's like they are inching towards it while saying the opposite.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #690  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2020, 4:20 PM
scryer scryer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFUVancouver View Post
Toyota is the sick man of the automotive world.


A fan of the old Ottoman Empire saying are we?
__________________
There is a housing crisis, and we simply need to speak up about it.

Pinterest - I use this social media platform to easily add pictures into my posts on this forum. Plus there are great architecture and city photos out there as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #691  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2020, 4:40 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 24,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Toyota has been "hybridizing" their entire lineup. People were begging for more electric only range, and finally they started producing a plug-in Prius in greater numbers. Now they are introducing a plug-in Rav4 (no brainer IMO).

It's like they are inching towards it while saying the opposite.
Inching is the problem for them. I don't think they ever expected to EVs just ramp up so fast. The flood of EVs coming over the next two years are going to make their hybrids seem as quaint as rotary dial phones.

Last edited by Truenorth00; Feb 15, 2020 at 4:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #692  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2020, 6:04 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 21,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Inching is the problem for them. I don't think they ever expected to EVs just ramp up so fast. The flood of EVs coming over the next two years are going to make their hybrids seem as quaint as rotary dial phones.
Nobody has ever accused the Japanese of risk-taking innovation...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #693  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2020, 6:23 PM
theman23's Avatar
theman23 theman23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ville de Québec
Posts: 5,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
The other issue for hydrogen is the cost of fueling. It's ridiculously expensive.



https://cafcp.org/content/cost-refill

So basically, you're swapping one expensive fuel for another. The Japanese and Koreans just don't want to admit they got caught napping and bet on the wrong horse.
Koreans? Hyundai has more electric cars than any other manufacturer, Tesla included.
__________________
For entertainment purposes only. Not financial advice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #694  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2020, 6:35 PM
Denscity Denscity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Within the Cordillera
Posts: 12,493
Just read BCs new cars purchased are up to 9% EV. Not sure how that compares nationally.
__________________
Castlegar BC: SSP's hottest city (43.9C)
Lytton BC: Canada’s hottest city (49.6C)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #695  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2020, 6:52 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,029
Last I read national was 0.9%.
__________________
Get off my lawn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #696  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2020, 7:51 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 21,673
According to Stats Can:

Quote:
In 2018, 2.2% of new motor vehicles registered in Canada were zero-emission vehicles—either plug-in hybrid electric or full battery-electric vehicles.
Trends are pretty clear though:

Quote:
The total number of new motor vehicle registrations in Canada in 2018 was 1,978,562, declining 2.7% from their peak in 2017. Prior to this decrease, new motor vehicle registrations had increased each year since 2011.

By fuel type, only new registrations of gasoline-powered vehicles declined in 2018. All other fuel types reported increases, including battery electric vehicles (+152.7%), plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (+85.1%) and hybrid electric vehicles (+11.1%).
2019 numbers should be interesting. I expect EVs to continue increasing dramatically, while overall sales decline slightly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #697  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2020, 6:40 PM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,191
re: hydrogen fuel cell, is the technology such that they wouldn't necessarily be banned from underground parking like many propane vehicles are?
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Heritage Watch - Forums
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #698  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2020, 7:30 PM
urbandreamer's Avatar
urbandreamer urbandreamer is offline
recession proof
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,552
Contractors next truck?
https://nikolamotor.com/badger
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #699  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2020, 8:34 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 21,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbandreamer View Post
Contractors next truck?
https://nikolamotor.com/badger
Maybe if it wasn't vaporware.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #700  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2020, 10:00 PM
ssiguy ssiguy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 10,714
Quote:
Originally Posted by DizzyEdge View Post
re: hydrogen fuel cell, is the technology such that they wouldn't necessarily be banned from underground parking like many propane vehicles are?
The days of the Hindenburg are long since over. A hydrogen has no more chance of blowing up than does a gas one.

The only place where hydrogen would not be safe is with underground trains due to the thousands on the platforms but this is no different from diesels/gas also not being allowed underground even if they entered the underground sections using pure battery power to stop emissions while travelling thru it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.