HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5421  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 8:13 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Where the lights are much brighter
Posts: 12,105
A feasibility study for the gondolas will be conducted by Texas A&M and paid for by the city, Cap Metro and CTRMA.

https://communityimpact.com/austin/n...ibility-study/
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5422  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 10:25 PM
lzppjb's Avatar
lzppjb lzppjb is offline
7th Gen Central Texan
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 3,144
I don't A&M doing anything for the City of Austin. They hate Austin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5423  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 10:38 PM
lzppjb's Avatar
lzppjb lzppjb is offline
7th Gen Central Texan
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 3,144
If this was mentioned, I missed it. That vote on I-35 aesthetics is done and concept 1 won. It's the one that mimics the capitol building. I voted for it.

http://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot...esentation.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5424  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 11:17 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,346
When will we know about the downtown section being depressed versus them being elevated?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5425  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2016, 1:40 AM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
A feasibility study for the gondolas will be conducted by Texas A&M and paid for by the city, Cap Metro and CTRMA.

https://communityimpact.com/austin/n...ibility-study/
Not just "gondolas"

"Staff requests Board direction as to whether the Mobility Authority should participate in a feasibility assessment for urban cable in Central Texas similar to the concept presented by Wire One Austin at the September 7, 2016 Board Meeting. "

similar to the Wire One. So long-distance, over existing roadway right of way. Maybe presupposing south 1st, but I can't tell that exactly.

In other words, none of the actual advantages of gondolas.

http://www.mobilityauthority.com/abo...ing-agenda.php

As I said before, a complete waste of taxpayer resources.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5426  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2016, 2:14 PM
texboy texboy is offline
constructor extrodinaire!
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by lzppjb View Post
I don't A&M doing anything for the City of Austin. They hate Austin.
Except for the fact that after Houston, Austin has the most A&M grads of any city in Texas. Will Wynn, a champion of downtown Austin, and from what I gather is fairly celebrated, is an A&M grad. Jus' sayin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5427  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2016, 2:54 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
As I said before, a complete waste of taxpayer resources.
Right, but what would our government do all day if not waste our taxes?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5428  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2016, 8:24 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,753
My only question regarding a gondola system is will it be in use during strong storms or high winds? What about people already in the gondolas when high winds hit? I'm assuming that there will be an early warning system in place to ensure a situation like that is unlikely. What if the power goes out due to lightning?

I'll just consolidate all those questions. Will the gondolas be shut down every time bad weather hits or is that something the study will take into consideration?
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5429  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2016, 9:14 PM
nixcity's Avatar
nixcity nixcity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Austin, TX.
Posts: 768
Quote:
A feasibility study for the gondolas will be conducted by Texas A&M and paid for by the city, Cap Metro and CTRMA.

https://communityimpact.com/austin/n...ibility-study/
These people are nuts, meanwhile in Phoenix voters will decide on a 31.5 billion dollar transportation bond.....


http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/...ties/91225414/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5430  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2016, 9:39 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by nixcity View Post
These people are nuts, meanwhile in Phoenix voters will decide on a 31.5 billion dollar transportation bond.....


http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/...ties/91225414/
There is a BIG difference in asking citizens to approve a plan which would increase the sales tax (Phoenix) and one in which asks it's citizens to increase their own, personal property tax (Austin).

In any case, $31B is huge. Their government would not bring it forward for a vote unless there was a rather large chance that it could pass. Furthermore, it's a vision. It is a $31B plan to be implemented out over the coming 30+ years period. I applaud their visionary plan. Austin seems to love going in circles...chasing it's own tail.
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 979,882 +1.87% - '20-'23 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,495,295 +4.23% - '20-'23 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5431  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2016, 10:40 PM
austlar1 austlar1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 3,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBoot View Post
There is a BIG difference in asking citizens to approve a plan which would increase the sales tax (Phoenix) and one in which asks it's citizens to increase their own, personal property tax (Austin).

In any case, $31B is huge. Their government would not bring it forward for a vote unless there was a rather large chance that it could pass. Furthermore, it's a vision. It is a $31B plan to be implemented out over the coming 30+ years period. I applaud their visionary plan. Austin seems to love going in circles...chasing it's own tail.
You know, the Phoenix area built a pretty big freeway system (that's free as no tolls) from scratch starting in the early 90s. All they had prior to that were two interstates, IH10 running east to west, and IH17 running north to Flagstaff. The new roads were built with a special gas tax in Maricopa County. They have a history with this type of funding that worked well in the past. Still $31B is really, really "Yuge", so who knows how the voters will react. It would be nice if the Texas legislature gave local governments the right to set their own sales tax rates to raise revenue for transportation projects. I guess the fact that more than 2/3rd of Arizona's population lives in Maricopa County makes all the difference.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5432  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2016, 3:48 AM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 3,526
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by austlar1 View Post
It would be nice if the Texas legislature gave local governments the right to set their own sales tax rates to raise revenue for transportation projects. I guess the fact that more than 2/3rd of Arizona's population lives in Maricopa County makes all the difference.
Texas has set a maximum sales tax rate of 8.25%, yet only collects 6.25% itself. That leaves 2% for cities to collect and use as they wish. 1% every city can charge for its general revenues, and another 1% for special uses. CapMetro already collects 1% from Austin.

If Austin needs to collect more revenues to fund more programs, there are other taxes it can use; property, fees for permits, rental car and hotel room taxes, parking fees, electricity rates, telephone taxes, cable taxes, water and sewage rates - this list can go on and on. It's too easy to suggest raising sales taxes higher when other taxes and fees can be raised higher instead.

TXDOT could use an increase rate for fuels, the 20 cents per gallon for both gasoline and diesel doesn't raise enough to meet present needs. And USDOT could also raise its 18.4 cents per gallon for gasoline and 24.4 cents per gallon for diesel. I just wouldn't want both levels of government to raise their fuel taxes simultaneously - that would be a huge hit to the trucking industry. I suggest it's the fuel tax that needs to be increased, not the sales tax.

Last edited by electricron; Sep 30, 2016 at 12:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5433  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2016, 1:42 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by electricron View Post
If Austin needs to collect more revenues to fund more programs, there are other taxes it can use; property, fees for permits, rental car and hotel room taxes, parking fees, electricity rates, telephone taxes, cable taxes, water and sewage rates - this list can go on and on. It's too easy to suggest raising sales taxes higher when other taxes and fees can be raised higher instead.
Most of these taxes/fees can't be raised higher, or are severely limited in application.

I think we may be maxed on hotel tax rates. And the money that brings in has limits on what it can be used for (though the council started looking at what they could do within those limits).

electricity/water is a complete nonstarter. They actually had to _lower_ those rates recently, remember. They're 1) regulated by the public utilities commission and 2) service non-Austin residents that scream about even paying their fair share.

I'm of course always in favor of increasing the cost of parking.


Quote:
Originally Posted by electricron View Post
TXDOT could use an increase rate for fuels, the 20 cents per gallon for both gasoline and diesel doesn't raise enough to meet present needs. And USDOT could also raise its 18.4 cents per gallon for gasoline and 24.4 cents per gallon for diesel. I just wouldn't want both levels of government to raise their fuel taxes simultaneously - that would be a huge hit to the trucking industry. I suggest it's the fuel tax that needs to be increased, not the sales tax.
I'd definitely be in favor of raising these, but I don't buy that it would be a huge hit to the trucking industry.

Both the fed and state could raise rates by .20 immediately, and it would still be cheaper than what it cost a year or so ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5434  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2016, 6:27 PM
jtown,man jtown,man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
Most of these taxes/fees can't be raised higher, or are severely limited in application.

I think we may be maxed on hotel tax rates. And the money that brings in has limits on what it can be used for (though the council started looking at what they could do within those limits).

electricity/water is a complete nonstarter. They actually had to _lower_ those rates recently, remember. They're 1) regulated by the public utilities commission and 2) service non-Austin residents that scream about even paying their fair share.

I'm of course always in favor of increasing the cost of parking.




I'd definitely be in favor of raising these, but I don't buy that it would be a huge hit to the trucking industry.

Both the fed and state could raise rates by .20 immediately, and it would still be cheaper than what it cost a year or so ago.

You know oil works within a market, right? Its not static.

If you raise it .20 sure its cheaper than it was a year ago but when prices go back up again it will be .20 more..no matter how you look at it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5435  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2016, 8:11 PM
Speculator Speculator is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 256
Just drove down Mopac. They have A LOT of work to do. Anyone know what the latest schedule is for completion?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5436  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2016, 11:02 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speculator View Post
Just drove down Mopac. They have A LOT of work to do. Anyone know what the latest schedule is for completion?
You know, I can't stand the color they chose for the sound walls. It looks like what you would see in Phoenix. Besides, I was under the impression that they were gonna plant native climbing vines.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5437  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2016, 1:43 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,346
Can someone take pictures of the color? I'm living afar now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5438  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2016, 1:55 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin <------------> Birmingham?
Posts: 57,332
__________________
Conform or be cast out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5439  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2016, 8:14 PM
Flatiron's Avatar
Flatiron Flatiron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin
Posts: 198
They should build a train overpass at the intersection. And then run a light rail line either on the same track or one next to it:

http://kxan.com/2016/10/14/stalled-t...-intersection/

Last edited by Flatiron; Oct 14, 2016 at 8:15 PM. Reason: wrong link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5440  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2016, 10:38 PM
Speculator Speculator is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 256
Part of the new Mopac Express lane opened today. Was gonna hop on it for $0.25 but needed to get off before Parmer. Looks pretty good, too bad final completion will be years late.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:45 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.