Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbrook
Decent modern materials on a traditional design can be ok. But rarely used. They usually cheap out. 10 Rit is ok. Not a well-designed, impressive exterior but ok. I can see how others might disagree and think it is better (or worse) than I do. Everyone has their own taste. But the boundaries of personal taste only stretch so far. I think Symphony House is objectively hideous and an affront to the eyes...
|
Although I recognize that it's likely the most criticized modern high-rise in Philly, I think even Symphony House has redeeming value and is in the eye of the beholder.
I understand the notion that buildings like SH and 10 Ritt are not constructed with the same technique and prowess as historic art-deco buildings. However, I do appreciate the effort to at least preserve and give homage to a vernacular that is very prevalent in Philly. For modern buildings, these are all built with solid concrete, brick or limestone materials and fit in pretty well with their context and have character. Could their interpretations have been improved upon? Absolutely. Are they complete failures? Absolutely not.
Overall, I think the most positive trend for Philly is that design standards and execution have significantly improved over the past decade. More daring and unconventional designs are not only encouraged but expected, which surely wasn't the case 15-20 years ago. Comparing discussions of design in Philadelphia to other cities, it does seem like Philadelphians are much more critical than most, and the pervasive "woe is me" mentality is completely unwarranted.
What's exciting is that the city appears to have finally reached a real estate value tipping point where new projects are frequently popping up. With the trajectory it is on and its revitalization phase still relatively young, even more exciting design definitely lies ahead for the city.