HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2641  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2020, 12:33 AM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
So this is an interim measure, I’m guessing?
Yes, for the interim between now and when the fancy plan is actualized in A.D. 2307.
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2642  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2020, 2:55 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy6 View Post
Yes, for the interim between now and when the fancy plan is actualized in A.D. 2307.
They sped up the timeline?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2643  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2020, 2:56 PM
The Jabroni's Avatar
The Jabroni The Jabroni is offline
Go kicky fast, okay!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Donut Dominion
Posts: 2,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
They sped up the timeline?
There's a timeline?
__________________
Back then, I used to be indecisive.

Now, I'm not so sure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2644  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2020, 3:26 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildCake View Post
Looks like a proper merge lane is being put in from SB to WB at St anne's and Perimeter. Better than the "Welcome to 80km/h traffic merge-but-is-actually-a-yield" that is there now
What for, it’s not like any Manitoba drivers know how to actually use merge lanes, either stop at the beginning or in the middle of the merge lane is the usual approach for most here!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2645  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2020, 3:34 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
What for, it’s not like any Manitoba drivers know how to actually use merge lanes, either stop at the beginning or in the middle of the merge lane is the usual approach for most here!
Counterpoint: That is the only prudent way to drive in unfamiliar areas where you don't know if you have a 100 m merge lane or absolutely nothing at all. And hell, St. Mary's SB to WB Perimeter gives you barely a few feet to merge into highway traffic...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2646  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2020, 9:38 PM
Wpgstvsouth94 Wpgstvsouth94 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 343
I really hope they announce another interchange next year. St Anne’s should have been a package deal with st Mary’s due to the close proximity. Get it done all in one piece.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2647  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2020, 10:17 PM
WildCake WildCake is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wpgstvsouth94 View Post
I really hope they announce another interchange next year. St Anne’s should have been a package deal with st Mary’s due to the close proximity. Get it done all in one piece.
Some other posters have suggested that St Annes will be a package deal with the rail overpass, since those two are a lot closer to one another

Edit: to add, the St Annes interchange will require a lot of private property:

https://www.gov.mb.ca/mit/hpd/pth100...e/segment5.pdf

Last edited by WildCake; Sep 21, 2020 at 12:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2648  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2020, 1:06 AM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ The South Perimeter has existed for 60+ years... literally the better part of a century. How on earth did the province not assemble the land for interchanges in that time?!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2649  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2020, 2:21 PM
WildCake WildCake is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ The South Perimeter has existed for 60+ years... literally the better part of a century. How on earth did the province not assemble the land for interchanges in that time?!
Lack of planning for sure, but in their defense the intersection was as rural as it gets back in the day.

Here's a map of the built-up Winnipeg in 1966, 11 years after Perimeter was started. Urban Winnipeg barely crept over what is now Bishop Grandin (you can see the ROW as an empty sliver in the St Vital area).

https://www.flickr.com/photos/manito...7622681947364/

They should have acquired the land when St Vital/River Park South started sprawling towards Perimeter in the 90s/early 00s.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2650  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2020, 2:27 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ Yes, but when you're planning an expressway you would think that some thought would be given to land acquisition for future needs! Some interchanges were built right off the bat so it's not like the entire concept of interchanges was in the far off, distant future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2651  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2020, 4:52 PM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ Yes, but when you're planning an expressway you would think that some thought would be given to land acquisition for future needs! Some interchanges were built right off the bat so it's not like the entire concept of interchanges was in the far off, distant future.
I imagine that an interchange at St. Anne's, which I remember as a little country road, would have seemed so far in the future that they wouldn't have bothered.
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2652  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2020, 5:29 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,832
Construction starting shortly on replacing the Jersey barrier between Portage Ave and Roblin Blvd.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2653  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2020, 9:37 PM
Eric19 Eric19 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 25
Not sure if someone already posted this:

https://news.gov.mb.ca/news/print,index.html?item=49223

"The Manitoba government is moving forward with the tendering process for a new bridge on Provincial Trunk Highway (PTH) 59 over the Red River Floodway"

This was posted on Sept 15/2020.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2654  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2020, 1:49 AM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,962
Yup. Although I havent seen the tender posted on merx yet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2655  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2020, 1:31 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,832
^^^Should be in early Oct
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2656  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2020, 4:27 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
Construction starting shortly on replacing the Jersey barrier between Portage Ave and Roblin Blvd.
Any insight on why they are replacing the Jersey barrier when that stretch of the Perimeter is included in the south Perimeter overhaul and will need more lanes added?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2657  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2020, 4:47 PM
WildCake WildCake is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryB View Post
Any insight on why they are replacing the Jersey barrier when that stretch of the Perimeter is included in the south Perimeter overhaul and will need more lanes added?
Because the jersey barriers is a safety item that desperately needed to be replaced, and is relatively inexpensive to do.

The timeline for the south Perimeter overhaul was something like 30 years. Who knows when the specific upgrades to 6 lanes in that stretch of highway will be done. It will be sooner than most of Perimeter as the sections that include river crossings are by far the busiest stretches of the whole highway, but that is still years away.

Chances are, the jersey barriers will needed to be replaced again before that happens.

Edit: Found the 2019 Provincial traffic counts for those interested. These stretches are by far the highest in the Province road network:
Perimeter between Portage and PTH 3
Perimeter between Waverley and St Annes
Perimeter between PTH 7 and PTH 9 (Main)
59 North around the Perimeter interchange
Hwy 1 East between Perimeter and Deacons

http://umtig.eng.umanitoba.ca/mhtis/...lowmap2019.pdf

So basically gives you an idea of where our infrastructure money should be spent on tackling deficiencies in the highway network

Last edited by WildCake; Sep 23, 2020 at 5:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2658  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2020, 4:58 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,962
The 6 lanes upgrades are over 30 years out. That stretch of highway will remain as is for a long time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2659  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2020, 6:26 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,832
The Jersey barrier between Waverley and St Mary's was scheduled to be replaced this fall as well, but I believe that project might be put off until the St Mary's interchange is done.

I guess they could do part of it up to the river crossing and leave the rest. The part from the river crossing to St Mary's would have to come out for detours and ramp construction.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2660  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2020, 6:53 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,962
Would you happen to know what the limits of the St. mary's work is? How far down the highway would they go with the re-build. Just to end of the ramps or do some of the median widening stuff too? Seems they would need to get fairly close to the bridge based on the design report.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:40 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.