HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #12581  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2024, 3:21 PM
BKB BKB is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 184
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmacc View Post
I remember watching a presentation on this master plan a year or 2 ago. They specifically mentioned the need to eliminate left hand turns where ever possible as the average left adds a minute and a half to a route. This route at this junction alone has 2 unnecessary lefts that Columbia. Why not just stay on scurfield and save 3 minutes to the route?
Wouldn't those be left hand turns at three or four way stops which wouldn't cause any delays?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12582  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2024, 4:01 PM
dmacc dmacc is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by FactaNV View Post
Isn't there a school on Columbia this is servicing?
There is an elementary school at the corner of columbia and scurfield, either road could service this school. Though I don't imagine a lot of families in that area utilize the bus for young children.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12583  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2024, 4:05 PM
dmacc dmacc is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by BKB View Post
Wouldn't those be left hand turns at three or four way stops which wouldn't cause any delays?
From what I remember it was the average time of left turns. So turning left at a high traffic intersection would be greater then 1:30mins and low traffic less than 1:30mins. Either way remove all unnecessary left turns. During peek child drop off/pick up at the nearby school, delays would increase and cause delays down the line for no good reason.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12584  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2024, 5:44 PM
borkborkbork's Avatar
borkborkbork borkborkbork is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,311
It looks like the whole DMIS system is down...

Quote:
"Server Error in '/dmis' Application.
Runtime Error
Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12585  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2024, 5:44 PM
WildCake WildCake is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 856
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmacc View Post
I remember watching a presentation on this master plan a year or 2 ago. They specifically mentioned the need to eliminate left hand turns where ever possible as the average left adds a minute and a half to a route. This route at this junction alone has 2 unnecessary lefts that Columbia. Why not just stay on scurfield and save 3 minutes to the route?
I think the issue with left hand turns is when you have to wait for a break in traffic to cross. Increased delays, increased unpredictability in when you might get a break, and higher safety risks. The left hand turns in that Whyte Ridge route are all stop-controlled which would mean your delays are roughly the same whether you go straight or turn.Taking that Columbia loop services a bunch more houses as a result.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12586  
Old Posted Yesterday, 1:59 PM
dmacc dmacc is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildCake View Post
I think the issue with left hand turns is when you have to wait for a break in traffic to cross. Increased delays, increased unpredictability in when you might get a break, and higher safety risks. The left hand turns in that Whyte Ridge route are all stop-controlled which would mean your delays are roughly the same whether you go straight or turn.Taking that Columbia loop services a bunch more houses as a result.
I didn't realize it was a stop controlled intersection from the google maps view I saw.

I don't think I agree that it services more houses as it will no longer service the north side of Whyte Ridge. It just makes it very convenient for people living in south WR and not so convenient for people in north WR. If it went straight down Scurfield it would be mildly convenient for everyone in WR.

I imagine some of the decision may be around safety for children. Going down Columbia means the school is on the right rather then the left if you go down Scurfield. This reduces the need to cross the street to catch the bus.

Either way, I guess I'm overthinking it and its impact will be minor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12587  
Old Posted Yesterday, 8:58 PM
Kinguni's Avatar
Kinguni Kinguni is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackDog204 View Post


Winnipeg transit finally will service Fort Whyte Alive, beginning September, at the new Buffalo crossing nature Centre on McGillivary near Brady road. They are rerouting the current Whyte Ridge transit route to link it to the Fort Whyte Alive.
You didn't include the route but looks like it's the 691 which provides weekday rush hour service only. Route 650 would still be servicing the north part of Scurfield.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:21 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.