Posted Nov 26, 2017, 5:08 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,801
|
|
^Yup, agreed. I just don't understand how this is coming up now when the project seemed to have full support of the city, BIZ, and CV. Imagine if this same argument about leaving the east facade exposed was used when the RRC Roblin Centre (fka PSC) was being constructed. There's nothing wrong with blending old and new, especially when it results in such a massive net positive.
If people are really worried about the aesthetics here, why has nothing (aside from on SSP) been said, or anyone been held accountable, for the way 92M was finished, different from the plan approved.
|