Quote:
Originally Posted by ilcapo
I just saw someone used the metric "Murders per square mile" rather than the usual per capita population metric. The point was to show that their city has a high number of murders per 100.000 pop, but since the city was so sprawly it didn't really affect the population the same way as it would in an urban environment.
Is there a point to this way of reasoning?
|
i dk, but i would think a full city murder map would tell you almost anything you want to know at a glance. then if you were unaware you could slice and dice up examing various areas of the city anyway you want to (ses, built environment, population density, etc., etc.).
