View Single Post
  #70  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2008, 9:17 PM
Ruckus's Avatar
Ruckus Ruckus is offline
working stiff
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Woodlawn Cemetery
Posts: 2,583
Good discussion, and I have nothing to contribute in terms of where Saskatoon fits into the scheme of things except that our rail facilities handle mostly agricultural products and potash, primarily destined for Asian markets (e.g. Port of Prince Rupert will see increased commodity flows from Saskatchewan producers due to congestion at Vancouver)

And I can't see either of Saskatchewan's big cities serving any primary role in terms of international distribution, domestically is a different story as many of you already hinted. The provincial government is seeking strategic partnerships to secure select manufacturing and distribution centres (e.g. Loblaws investment into Regina, although that is merely a re-location and upsizing from their current Saskatoon DC...so we're not much farther ahead than before, that could easily change though...as trueviking pointed out, money talks).

CNR yards - Served by CNR transcontinental main line


CPR yards - Served by CPR secondary main line


Location relative to YXE


Also a reference that came up in a past thread about inland port development...and the Saskatchewan Agrivision Corporation INC disbanded as an organization back in July, take that for what its worth. I have the 204kb pdf file format of the Interim Progress Report available if anyone is interested, as the Agrivision website is no longer active.

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saskatchewan Agrivision Corporation INC
An Interim Progress Report has been released on the "Prairie-to-Ports Gateway and Inland Port" project.
Here is a link to the Interim Progress Report.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saskatchewan Agrivision Corporation INC

Individual cities do not have capacity to be an inland port because a single
location has limited infrastructure and not enough volume of traffic. For example,
despite its location and size, the City of Winnipeg has been unsuccessful in
several attempts to establish an integrated road, rail and air “Inland Port” at one
location.

[...]



The Saskatchewan-based Inland Port, roughly identified by the yellow circle in
the above chart, has a very similar geographic size and configuration as the
successful Kansas City SmartPort, which is 185 miles [300 km] in diameter and
captures the assets of major highway, rail and air corridors.

It is important to remember that the Vancouver Port is composed of 41 terminal
locations across a broad geographic region. It also is not a single location. The
major cities of Moose Jaw, Regina and Saskatoon, when considered as a single
entity, provide most of the required assets and services of a “port”, albeit with a
more diffusely dispersed hinterland than the theoretical ideal.

[...]

The Progress Report of the current Prairie Gateway project, anticipated to be complete
by June 30, 2008, will include reports on a variety of important issues including:
1. A development plan for creating Federal “tax free zones” in the Inland Port region
to attract distribution centres, assembly facilities and other “port” services.
2. A ten-year export volume forecast for the major crops in Canada.
3. Promotion and public relations activities and presentations by Doug Campbell
and Agrivision in key transportation conferences, seminars, workshops and other
speaking opportunities to promote the Prairie Gateway and gather information
from other players in the North American and Global transportation supply
chains.
4. Compilation of key “drivers” for major investor / decision makers to endorse the

Prairie Gateway project.
Source - Page 7/8
Source

Last edited by Ruckus; Sep 22, 2008 at 9:48 PM.
Reply With Quote