View Single Post
  #16  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2016, 11:48 PM
SAtown SAtown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by WorldTexas View Post
If Silver Ventures owned both, I’d agree 100%. That they don’t own the building means that Samuel’s probably wants an exorbitant amount of money. Silver Ventures has bought up as much of the surrounding land as they could so they could stitch it all together. My guess is they couldn’t reach an agreement so they’re planning for this building to be on its own for a bit.
Silver Ventures owns the Samuels Glass properties, and Samuels Glass has relocated (or is in the process of relocating) to a new building they purchased on IH-35.
Reply With Quote