Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker
Thrown up by Markusoff of the Herald, a video by Jon Lord.
Big issue all along is that residents and the city can't even agree on facts, and that has been true for a decade or more. Not even on the need to do infrastructure repairs. Also, on a replacement property, I'd bet it was judged non viable because few residents said they wished to move there if given the option.
From the City News Release:
Given the pace of development along 16th Ave, I don't really think there is a case for invoking conspiracy in this situation.
|
Not sure I really trust a layman's opinion of the state of the infrastructure beneath their feet. Also it seems that if council could have done something to keep the people there they would have given the controversy that this has created over the years.