Posted Mar 13, 2015, 6:46 PM
|
 |
What could go wrong?
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,748
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simplicity
For the record, I'm passing along information that is being relayed to me through people I know. I don't have any personal relationship with the developer to confirm, but these are strange steps for a developer to be taking if there isn't any hardship.
Specifically, why on earth would you have a different architect of record from the designer if you're working with their design? I mean, outside of cost, this is a strange step to take. And why would an architect assume the liability for somebody else's design when the other somebody doesn't really have an high-rise experience either? It's definitely unconventional.
|
I agree with you. Very strange.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
|