Posted Jan 17, 2007, 5:58 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,581
|
|
I think both designs are great, but I like the bomber one more.
More seating on the sidelines and less in the endzone = better football experience.
Also, I don't think having 40,000 perminent seats is a good idea. If they go with the larger capacity, then the Bombers had better be able to fill all 40,000 seats every game, because there's nothing worse than going to a football game in a huge stadium that's half empty *cough cough* Toronto. Absolutely no atmosphere
The bomber proposal is better because it has less seating, but can be expanded if the demand is there
|