View Single Post
  #24  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2019, 12:42 AM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Belt View Post
True. However, Mesa does have couple miles of LRT transit, where Scottsdale does not.
Already noted above; Mesa has lots of people, is growing rapidly, and part of it is served by a light rail line.

Scottsdale is no urban paradise, but it is more urban and cohesive, is easier to negotiate by foot and bike, has a better central business district and more to do, and is generally more upscale than Mesa. It's got a peak census tract in the same range as Mesa's. And it has curb appeal. Tourists flock to Scottsdale, like they do to Tempe and downtown Phoenix. Mesa--not so much.

Quote:
Mesa has potential to develop an physical and visible urban node.
Sure, there's 'potential' in any place where it can't get much worse.
Reply With Quote