Quote:
Originally Posted by DZH22
New Haven has a bad rap, probably deserved in those areas, but downtown itself is very dense and beautiful. It has some truly stunning architecture.
Boston and San Francisco beg to differ.
|
San Francisco, yes. Boston has no where near the same levels of hills as a SF, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, etc. The latter two cities have big problems with landslides which make development on the hills very difficult. SF would not be able to be built in a place like Cincinnati or Pittsburgh, because the soil is too unstable.