View Single Post
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2009, 4:00 PM
Mininari Mininari is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Victoria (formerly Port Moody, then Winnipeg)
Posts: 2,326
Who thinks that this grand 30-40 year program will actually be completed?

I guess if it is terminated at some point, having many sections of 4-lane (passing) along 97 won't be bad.

This project almost seems to be a way of maximizing 4-lane highway produced for the dollar, especially if the traffic volumes are not terribly bad. Is it relatively cheaper to widen along 97 than the TCH? My guess is yes.

I'd still prefer to see more money going towards making the TCH 4-lanes, including a bridge-bypass of Salmon Arm. If the feds are responsible for the route through National Parks, then fine... but 4-lane the rest of the TCH!
Reply With Quote