Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRitsman
I suspect as I previously mentioned, that in an attempt to do exactly that, get a nice shorter staggered height, they proposed the max, and hope to settle with a better design and more interesting staggering.
|
This proposal actually fits within existing zoning, so there shouldn't be any opportunity for an LPAT appeal to be brought against it by any party, correct? They should be able to sail through the planning process without needing to settle anything with disgruntled neighbours.