View Single Post
Old Posted Mar 7, 2015, 9:01 PM
blueandgoldguy blueandgoldguy is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,840
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
The art is patronizing and kitsch, when a meddling group of misplaced do gooders and govt. hacks decides what artistic cultural expression is best for another culture based solely on financial gain to me that art just isn't genuine. Maybe pseudo wasn't the right word, maybe I should have said exploitive art.
Hasn't that art existed for hundreds if not thousands of years? If so, that would eliminate the idea of government officials or agencies forming the cultural expressions of that group.
Reply With Quote