Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj_wpg
It's an ugly eyesore of a building.
Putting people in there again now, when the bldg. surely needs demoing will just delay the sites redevelopment.
|
Except that there's more value to the city - and consequently the taxpayer - to keep the building intact and productive. If there weren't a restrictive caveat on the property, I might encourage the city to explore the options that might exist out there. But as it is, that's not really a practical consideration.