View Single Post
Old Posted Mar 20, 2018, 11:57 PM
Restless 1 Restless 1 is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 437
Originally Posted by Fryguy View Post
This project is no where near the River, so I am not understanding why they are making comments about the height at all. And the 120 foot restriction on buildings is ridiculous. Is the hotel Emma taller? Anyway, I feel a restriction should be used on projects on the River, only nothing less than 300 ft.
Seems Chicago is the closest example I can come up with offhand. Lots of tall buildings along their river, (yes, I know, not the same setup as our Riverwalk), and it is at once beautiful and cavernous.

I can see some height restrictions on the original three mile section of the Riverwalk, but not the areas just North and South of that original stretch.
Reply With Quote