View Single Post
  #150  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2020, 10:15 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenoflyzone View Post
With 48 teams, the caliber of gameplay was going to be diluted no matter where it came from, CONCACAF or another confederation.

It's as simple as that.
I don't really think so. You could conceivably add three or four more teams from the other confederations and not really skip a beat. CONMEBOL, UEFA, CAF, and AFC all have competitive teams that fail to qualify for WC. CONCACAF is the only federation (aside from Oceania) which doesn't really have the depth to add teams without feeling the dilution. Eight is way too many for CONCACAF.

Example of teams that did not qualify for WC 2018:

UEFA: Holland, Italy, Czechia, Turkey
CONMEBOL: Chile, Paraguay, Ecuador
CAF: Ivory Coast, Cameroon, Algeria
AFC: Iraq, China, Uzbekistan

Panama, who qualified over the US, had the pleasure of losing to Belgium 0-3, England 1-6, and Tunisia 1-2 at WC 2018. Honduras scored a combined one goal in their six matches between the 2010 and 2014 World Cups.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thenoflyzone View Post
I wouldn't be too quick to think that Canada wont have a chance to embarrass itself in 2026. Mexico and USA are on another level, one which Canada isn't a part of.
Canada can play the US and other equally-competitive teams tight. By 2026 Canada shouldn't be that awful - we just need to develop some central defenders. Knowing Canada they'll get stuck in a group with like France and Argentina or something.

Last edited by JHikka; Jul 28, 2020 at 10:28 PM.
Reply With Quote