View Single Post
  #2094  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2019, 2:35 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey View Post
Phase 2 public engagement slides are posted

https://www.gov.mb.ca/mit/hpd/pth100/public.html
I took a look and while I think they're moving in the right general direction, I am amazed at how many awkward, unexpected or just generally non-standard interchanges and routes there will be if the plan is fully realized.

-even with a bypass, NB Perimeter to WB TCH will still be busy, so why does the parclo option not have a loop for that movement?

-Roblin interchange redesign just looks flat out awkward without any obvious need for it

-Wilkes rebuild looks OK, just surprised at the sheer size of it

-Oak Bluff 100/2/3 looks like a dog's breakfast no matter which option is chosen. Unfortunate that there will be a major intersection just south of an interchange despite the traffic circle just having been built there.

-every configuration option for St. Mary's @ 100 looks very weird and awkward.

But apart from that it looks good and it's long overdue.
Reply With Quote