Posted Jan 25, 2015, 5:45 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,626
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by suburbia
It is a subsidy no matter how you cut it. And I agree that all museums get subsidies. But most museums are not "in large part" phallic structures commemorating a single individual or one group over another. Secondly, I highly suspect that the amount of subsidy the CMHR is set to receive, as normalized by number of *paying* visitors, is higher than most other national museums.
|
Right. "Highly suspect" = no actual facts or data.
Time to move on.
|