View Single Post
  #2105  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2019, 6:43 PM
Winnipegger Winnipegger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 712
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
So the way I see this is it is a major improvement overall. I read the bit about active transport which seems to be limited to providing crossing options to several locations which is fine. Oak Bluff and St. Mary's look a little awkward but we'll soon forget about that. I think the only real concern is that they haven't taken into account the TCH/207 intersection nor have they provided any information about the Headingly Bypass, which will be required before long. I'm very please with the alignment options for the St Norbert Bypass, one of which closely resembles what my idea was for the stretch.

Hopefully the rest of TCH, 75, and North Perimeter begin receiving this kind of attention too soon.
With MIT having an annual budget of around $400 million, I don't know if ANY of our roads will be getting this sort of attention any time soon...
Reply With Quote