Posted Sep 11, 2019, 2:57 AM
|
你的媽媽
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,795
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lio45
With your logic, there's no difference between me going somewhere on foot or driving there alone in a 4x4 V8 Chevy Suburban, since at planetary scale it doesn't change anything.
I mean, nothing matters anymore with that kind of logic. (Short of a global nuclear war, I guess.)
If the people in that area of California can stop burning fossil fuels and instead use clean electricity (which is available there), that's a positive, not negative, step. Therefore, I'm for it. Why are you against it?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876
At the end of the day, this will do nada to reduce the impact on climate change. Even if half of the U.S. went green, we still have a whole other world to worry about. When it comes to climate change, its a global issue, not really a local issue. And at this point in time, there are priorities that demand more focus before trivial impacts such as this are tackled, at least on the local level.
|
Case in point.
I mean, why bother recycling if half the world doesn't?
|