Posted Sep 18, 2012, 5:08 AM
|
 |
be nice to the crackheads
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,531
|
|
Just because Montana and Wyoming don't complain, that means BC shouldn't as well? Tight logic.
The pipeline runs through the entire province horizontally. If they pipe ruptures, the chance that the affected area will be in BC is around 90%. Oh, and without the terminal on BC's coast, the oil wouldn't be going anywhere in Asia. BC definitely has a right to a bigger piece of the pie as it takes on most of the risk, and has the land to export abroad.
If you think that's too much to ask, try exporting it down south first, and then to Asia. I'm sure they'll give you a better distribution deal *sarcasm*.
|