Quote:
Originally Posted by sirkingwilliam
It’s not a waste of land if they’re bring used. Not liking them doesn’t make them a waste. They are useful and serve a purpose. Could they be integrated better? Yes. Could they have dual purposes? Yes.
But, they are not wasteful uses of land.
|
Yes they are. If retail, or a hotel, or business tower were there, they would generate more revenue for the city.
And if we just end up tearing down these eyesores for just such uses, then what was the point? If using up prime DT land for parking cars isn't a waste, I don't what is.