View Single Post
  #70  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2014, 9:58 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,785
^ You're right. It should be PTH 100 first. Then I can justify doing the 202 and Garven interchanges as part of the 59N interchange project, prior to finishing or in conjunction with, PTH 101. 59N and 101 is the busiest stretch of road in the province. There was a traffic flow map posted somewhere on SSP. I'll see if I can dig it up. But finishing PTH 100 first makes sense as it's a "national highway". Loose quotations as the Feds really don't maintain or pay for it.

Maybe it'll all be happening simultaneously over the next 5-10 (or 20) years . Sounds like MIT has a 5-10 year plan for PTH 100. The 59N is 5-10 years from completion, if ever.

Maybe none of it will happen once Pallister is voted in...
Reply With Quote