View Single Post
  #5366  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2018, 2:37 PM
dktshb's Avatar
dktshb dktshb is offline
Environmental Sabotage
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco/ Los Angeles/ Tahoe
Posts: 5,059
Quote:
Originally Posted by ealba View Post
What this doesn’t take into account (and the article acknowledges this, but not enough, in my opinion, to keep from being misleading) is that because of natural growth, the populations of Los Angeles, New York City, and Chicago are growing, despite any net negative migration metric applied.

2. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, California

Population decrease due to migration, 2010-2017: -93,959
Population change, 2010-2017: +4.1 percent (12,828,961 to 13,353,907)
Natural growth, 2010-2017: 1,202,115 births, 578,750 deaths
Median home value: $578,200

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money...tion/35801453/
Additionally, it is not referring to the City of Los Angeles, but rather the County of Los Angeles.
Reply With Quote