SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Never Built & Visionary Projects (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=342)
-   -   NEW YORK | NYSE Tower | 1,792 FT / 546 M | 140 FLOORS | NEVER BUILT (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=151098)

chris08876 Jul 28, 2013 12:54 PM

It would work now with the balance of supertalls (soon to come) and WTC1 and WTC4. Make it straighter...maybe some cross bracing, and it could be a 1792ft to the roof. Wishful thinking.

Onn Oct 20, 2013 1:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris08876 (Post 6213073)
It would work now with the balance of supertalls (soon to come) and WTC1 and WTC4. Make it straighter...maybe some cross bracing, and it could be a 1792ft to the roof. Wishful thinking.

I was thinking the exact same! Looking back on the plethora of construction taking place in New York today, its so disappointing this one never made it past the drawing board. I kind of wish someone would pick the design back up again and build it in that same location. Is the NYSE sure it couldn't use a nice new supertall HQ building for the 21st Century... :(


http://i166.photobucket.com/albums/u.../nysetower.jpg

http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/1250/pan0.png
http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/1250/pan0.png

Hudson11 Oct 20, 2013 3:20 AM

if that didn't involve clearing away a huge chunk of wall street i'd be all for it.

Onn Oct 20, 2013 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hudson11 (Post 6309001)
if that didn't involve clearing away a huge chunk of wall street i'd be all for it.

Maybe, but if Lower Manhattan wants to compete with Midtown for office space they're going to have to build big. And there's no reason such a tower couldn't be taller than 1WTC.

hunser Oct 20, 2013 1:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onn (Post 6309203)
Maybe, but if Lower Manhattan wants to compete with Midtown for office space they're going to have to build big. And there's no reason such a tower couldn't be taller than 1WTC.

Lower Manhattan still struggles to rebuild the WTC. But as soon as the new WTC is filled up (and everything around it finished- memorial, hub, path etc.) and people realize that Downtown is once again the place to be, we could see some bold proposals in the near future. I'm also very optimistic because we see a lot of residential / hotel towers going up.

Onn Oct 20, 2013 3:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hunser (Post 6309205)
Lower Manhattan still struggles to rebuild the WTC. But as soon as the new WTC is filled up (and everything around it finished- memorial, hub, path etc.) and people realize that Downtown is once again the place to be, we could see some bold proposals in the near future. I'm also very optimistic because we see a lot of residential / hotel towers going up.

Here's hoping that the WTC fills up quickly from here on out. I feel like Lower Manhattan is still reeling from some of the effects of 9/11, which it needs to get past to rebuild again. If Manhattan is to compete with the Hudson Yards and Midtown East Rezoning, they need something like this.

scalziand Oct 27, 2013 5:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hudson11 (Post 6309001)
if that didn't involve clearing away a huge chunk of wall street i'd be all for it.

We've been over this already earlier in the thread; the tower would have been built on landfill in the East River east of FDR.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYguy (Post 4024097)

An option under consideration is tearing down an old office building at 2 Broadway, near Battery Park, and constructing a new headquarters there, according to the real estate executives. Another possibility would be putting up a vast building at the eastern end of Wall Street, over the East River. The developer Donald J. Trump has proposed that site to the exchange, the real estate executives said.

The city, and not Mr. Trump, controls the waterfront there, just south of the South Street Seaport and two piers with indoor tennis courts.


No demolition required.

Onn Oct 28, 2013 3:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scalziand (Post 6317140)
We've been over this already earlier in the thread; the tower would have been built on landfill in the East River east of FDR.

No demolition required.

That's what I thought, no demolition required. If a tower taller than 1 WTC were to be built in Lower Manhattan this would be a good place to put it. We should get Trump on the phone asap. :help:

Hudson11 Oct 29, 2013 4:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scalziand (Post 6317140)
We've been over this already earlier in the thread; the tower would have been built on landfill in the East River east of FDR.



No demolition required.

I was refering the post which was above mine.

Pete8680 Aug 29, 2014 12:06 AM

I'm surprised no one pointed this out. Had this bin built the roof height of 1,792 feet is the same as the freedom tower total height. (1,776 to the spire but 1,792 feet to the lightning rod). Maybe something similar (probably a little shorter) like this will rise in Jersey City sum day!

Perklol Aug 29, 2014 12:20 AM

is it safe to build taller towers on landfill? :o

Hudson Yards Phase 2 is also all landfill iirc.

Swede Sep 18, 2014 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eveningsong (Post 6710028)
is it safe to build taller towers on landfill? :o

Hudson Yards Phase 2 is also all landfill iirc.

Yes it is safe. Because it is not really built on landfill, it is built on the bedrock below while the streets etc around it are built on landfill.

Perklol Sep 26, 2014 5:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swede (Post 6734275)
Yes it is safe. Because it is not really built on landfill, it is built on the bedrock below while the streets etc around it are built on landfill.

ty for the answer :cheers:

NYguy Dec 12, 2017 4:38 PM

https://hyperallergic.com/407505/nev...queens-museum/


https://hyperallergic.com/wp-content...5-1080x720.jpg

Mr Saturn64 Dec 12, 2017 7:16 PM

Woah. That's something else. What really stands out to me are those buildings next to the Twin Towers. Was there a pre-9/11 proposal going, or is that an alternate design for the rebuild?

Hudson11 Dec 12, 2017 7:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Saturn64 (Post 8016604)
Woah. That's something else. What really stands out to me are those buildings next to the Twin Towers. Was there a pre-9/11 proposal going, or is that an alternate design for the rebuild?

those are the infamous "hashtag" towers which were a proposal for the post 9/11 redevelopment. :yuck: Apparently they were from Richard Meier. To be fair, a lot of weird proposals for the site came from famous architects.

http://www.richardmeier.com/wp-conte...L-1024x441.jpg

http://www.richardmeier.com/wp-conte...L-1024x437.jpg

http://images.adsttc.com/media/image...jpg?1363826810

photoLith Dec 12, 2017 8:04 PM

Ewww thank god that didn't happen.

jd3189 Dec 18, 2017 4:19 AM

Looks like two hashtags.

MolsonExport Dec 18, 2017 6:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hudson11 (Post 8016615)
those are the infamous "hashtag" towers which were a proposal for the post 9/11 redevelopment. :yuck: Apparently they were from Richard Meier. To be fair, a lot of weird proposals for the site came from famous architects.

http://www.richardmeier.com/wp-conte...L-1024x441.jpg

http://www.richardmeier.com/wp-conte...L-1024x437.jpg

http://images.adsttc.com/media/image...jpg?1363826810

http://pattayaone.news/wp-content/up...t-building.jpg
pattayaone

canucklehead2 Jan 9, 2018 2:05 AM

Still wish this one gets built at some time in the future. Manhattan looks best with a series of smaller but thinner super-tall towers if you ask me...


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.