SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Completed Project Threads Archive (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=348)
-   -   JERSEY CITY | Journal Square | Phase 1 | 544 FT | 54 FLOORS (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=198312)

RobertWalpole Mar 19, 2012 6:19 AM

JERSEY CITY | Journal Square | Phase 1 | 544 FT | 54 FLOORS
 
I don't know if this is the final design. If so, it's ok, but it will be nice to see an 82 story tower in JC.

http://handelarch.com/projects/type/...sidential.html

Journal Square
Jersey City
Journal Square is a new mixed-use high-rise development awarded through a design competition to Handel Architects and HWKN. The three tower project – the tallest at 82 stories - includes over 2,000 apartments, as well as office space and retail. A sweeping, tree-filled plaza will host farmer’s markets, evening film projections and public events along its low stairs that slope down to the PATH station. Wide, public walkways under each tower’s entrance encourage people to move easily from the plaza into the surrounding neighborhood


http://handelarch.com/images/project...l-square/1.jpg

Dylan Leblanc Mar 19, 2012 6:40 AM

Wow OMG is this serious? I always thought it was a shame that the Journal Square project never went anywhere.

NYC2ATX Mar 19, 2012 8:09 AM

If this is a serious proposal, which I hope it is, this is mind-numbingly fucking awesome. The whole New York area is an unstoppable force. It feels like we're close to rivaling the Tokyo megalopolis...with a better set of skylines ;)

Roadcruiser1 Mar 19, 2012 12:05 PM

If built this building can easily pass the 1,000 foot mark. It would be anywere between 1,100 to 1,200 feet high.

babybackribs2314 Mar 19, 2012 12:27 PM

This project is absolutely fantastic, and hopefully comes to fruition... would make a very iconic addition to the JC skyline, and hopefully encourage similar developments in DoBro and LIC.

OhioGuy Mar 19, 2012 1:09 PM

So if this happened, where would it be located in relation to the PATH station? Would they build above the tracks to the Northwest of the station (across JFK Blvd?) Or would they build to the East-Southeast of the PATH station?

Nexis4Jersey Mar 19, 2012 1:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OhioGuy (Post 5632710)
So if this happened, where would it be located in relation to the PATH station? Would they build above the tracks to the Northwest of the station (across JFK Blvd?) Or would they build to the East-Southeast of the PATH station?

It would be right next to the JSQ station?

OhioGuy Mar 19, 2012 1:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nexis4Jersey (Post 5632712)
It would be right next to the JSQ station?

The description says, "A sweeping, tree-filled plaza will host farmer’s markets, evening film projections and public events along its low stairs that slope down to the PATH station."

I wasn't sure whether that meant construction on the east side of JFK Blvd or the west side. If I had to guess, I'd assume the east side so that people don't actually have to cross JFK Blvd to get to the station entrance.

scalziand Mar 19, 2012 2:59 PM

Going by this rendering, it's on the east side.

http://handelarch.com/images/project...l-square/2.jpg

Towers on the blue parcel, plaza on the green parcel.
http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/9...jerseycity.png

Dac150 Mar 19, 2012 4:55 PM

That would really be something if this project comes to fruition!

Zapatan Mar 19, 2012 5:52 PM

Pleeease let this be real.

Supertalls for JC, Brooklyn, Queens, wow that would be so sweet, someday... someday...

patriotizzy Mar 19, 2012 6:04 PM

Holy cheeses and crackers.

Roadcruiser1 Mar 19, 2012 6:49 PM

It would be instantly noticeable from the World Trade Center, and the World Financial Center from Manhattan if it is ever built. It is taller than anything else in Hoboken or Jersey City.

NYC4Life Mar 19, 2012 6:59 PM

This would be further away from the main cluster of towers in the Exchange Place and Newport areas, but still an excellent addition.

jd3189 Mar 19, 2012 7:27 PM

If this is really going to be built, it will be another step into expanding high rises and skylines away from Manhattan. Greater New York is going to expand in these next few years.

arkitekte Mar 19, 2012 7:44 PM

This proposal is on a very high level of badass.

summersm343 Mar 19, 2012 8:29 PM

Ya see, there is one MAJOR problem to this. How in the hell are they going to fill 2,000 apartments in Jersey City? It's likely going to be lowered significantly if it is even approved. If I am wrong someone please correct me... then I will be excited for this.

Crawford Mar 19, 2012 8:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by summersm343 (Post 5633287)
Ya see, there is one MAJOR problem to this. How in the hell are they going to fill 2,000 apartments in Jersey City?

The rental vacancy rate in the core counties of the metropolitan area are around 1%. There's a desperate shortage of rental apartments.

Dac150 Mar 19, 2012 8:36 PM

The area continues to be a desirable place to live and work. Whether that constitutes this kind of demand I cannot say, however I don't think the area has been built up by accident.

Roadcruiser1 Mar 19, 2012 8:52 PM

There has also been a proposal around this area as well for 2 buildings that would be around 600 feet tall. It would also be residential, but nothing happened as of yet. I am certain that Journal Square would someday be a high rise residential area. These 5 towers are just the beginning of what would someday be a massive skyline in Jersey City and Hoboken.

Busy Bee Mar 19, 2012 10:00 PM

Is this related at all to that tall proposal from a few years back from that developer who was, well, quite elderly?

Thundertubs Mar 19, 2012 10:29 PM

Yowzers. This is the first I've heard of it. There was a proposal for twin towers back around '06, the tallest being around 60 stories. There is a big hole in the middle of JSQ where they cleared some old buildings for it. Last I heard, the city was pressuring the developers to either build something or sell the site.

It would be pretty badass if this went through, although I remain skeptical for the time being. It's a very radical change for a neighborhood that, though brimming with potential, still has yet to see much development action.

Quote:

Originally Posted by summersm343 (Post 5633287)
Ya see, there is one MAJOR problem to this. How in the hell are they going to fill 2,000 apartments in Jersey City?

2,000 apartments is nothing. There's way more than that coming. Downtown Jersey City was blowing up before the recession, and has a huge pipeline of residential hi-rises approved and ready to start. Journal Square is not currently a hot neighborhood, but it's only one stop further from the hot part of Jersey City, and is a serious transit hub. It's also a relatively inexpensive area. I could see these apartments moving pretty quickly.

Jersey City put up about a dozen+ very tall residential buildings in the last 8 years or so, and they're all pretty much filled up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1 (Post 5633312)
These 5 towers are just the beginning of what would someday be a massive skyline in Jersey City and Hoboken.

I wouldn't count on much more of a skyline from Hoboken. It's approaching build-out (it has only think of one big vacant lot downtown) and is NIMBY-central. Also, the one big hi-rise Hoboken does have, the W Hotel, is so hideous that it may have ruined Hoboken's taste for high-rises.

scalziand Mar 20, 2012 2:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Busy Bee (Post 5633431)
Is this related at all to that tall proposal from a few years back from that developer who was, well, quite elderly?

Do you mean this one?
http://blog.nj.com/ledgerupdates_imp...rge_render.jpg
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/200...eils_jour.html

I don't think so. They appear to be on different parcels.
http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/9...jerseycity.png
^ ....................................................................................... ^
Old project site ............................................................... This project

Roadcruiser1 Mar 20, 2012 2:32 AM

Well you won't attract much residents if your house is near a funeral home. I think that would scare most people away.

scalziand Mar 20, 2012 3:26 AM

Made a quick model-its BIG.

http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/5643/jsquare.jpg

From WTC:
http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/8800/jswtc.jpg

Busy Bee Mar 20, 2012 3:26 AM

Ahhh, so is that old unrelated proposal long dead or on the back back burner somewhere?

Zapatan Mar 20, 2012 3:31 AM

It's kinda far from the main skyline, still cool though :D

NYguy Mar 20, 2012 2:07 PM

I go through that area pretty frequently, but I'll have to refresh my memory on the turn of events there. There was a specific reason why the older proposal never got built, and a lot would have to happen before this one could. Journal Square could and should support more office development though.

sbarn Mar 20, 2012 11:41 PM

At the risk of sounding like a pessimist, this proposal seems pretty far fetched. :sly:

summersm343 Mar 20, 2012 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sbarn (Post 5635159)
At the risk of sounding like a pessimist, this proposal seems pretty far fetched. :sly:

Unfortunately, I have to agree with you. If anything arises out of this, it will not be a supertall, in fact I doubt it will even reach 800 feet. :yuck:

Crawford Mar 21, 2012 1:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYguy (Post 5634297)
I go through that area pretty frequently, but I'll have to refresh my memory on the turn of events there. There was a specific reason why the older proposal never got built, and a lot would have to happen before this one could. Journal Square could and should support more office development though.

I've never heard of anything on this exact site, and I think it's a new proposal.

There's another major Journal Square site that's received tons of press (a two-towered development, the taller being 62 floors), but that's on an adjacent site.

Dac150 Mar 21, 2012 2:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sbarn (Post 5635159)
At the risk of sounding like a pessimist, this proposal seems pretty far fetched. :sly:

Personally, I would like to read about which developer is involved with the project. I looked at the webpage on the architect's site and it's more or less marketing material.

R@ptor Mar 21, 2012 2:23 AM

Somehow this would look much better on the waterfront rather than so far away from Jersey City's main cluster.

Zapatan Mar 21, 2012 2:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R@ptor (Post 5635368)
Somehow this would look much better on the waterfront rather than so far away from Jersey City's main cluster.

I think we can all agree on that, it is a bit far away :shrug:

Crawford Mar 21, 2012 2:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R@ptor (Post 5635368)
Somehow this would look much better on the waterfront rather than so far away from Jersey City's main cluster.

This is located in Journal Square, which is Jersey City's main transit hub.

They're trying to shift highrise development more towards Journal Square, and just rezoned the neighborhood to allow towers.

scalziand Mar 21, 2012 3:26 AM

I don't see developers moving to Journal Square though until the waterfront is mostly filled up. There's still PLENTY of surface lots near the waterfront open for development.

Roadcruiser1 Mar 21, 2012 3:46 AM

There is lots of room for skyscrapers in Hoboken especially around Hoboken Terminal and the Lincoln Tunnel areas. I would like to see World Financial Center and World Trade Center like development around here.

SkyscrapersOfNewYork Mar 21, 2012 7:07 AM

Honestly i cant see office pace being built out in JC anytime in the near future. With the flood of new space going up in Manhattan particularly at the Hudson yards which is offering great rates i cant see why corporations would want to be anywhere else.

Nexis4Jersey Mar 21, 2012 8:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1 (Post 5635482)
There is lots of room for skyscrapers in Hoboken especially around Hoboken Terminal and the Lincoln Tunnel areas. I would like to see World Financial Center and World Trade Center like development around here.

Hoboken has a height limit and so does Neighboring Weehawken which is where the Lincoln Tunnel is located....

Towersteve Mar 21, 2012 1:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nexis4Jersey (Post 5635672)
Hoboken has a height limit and so does Neighboring Weehawken which is where the Lincoln Tunnel is located....

True Hoboken residents want to keep the city small. The Lincoln Tunnel area is not very accessible. There's usually a massive traffic backup in the mornings and evenings. The path train only goes into Hoboken about 20 blocks to the south. They have a light rail you can connect to but it's not big and doesn't run enough yet.

Nexis4Jersey Mar 21, 2012 2:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Towersteve (Post 5635740)
True Hoboken residents want to keep the city small. The Lincoln Tunnel area is not very accessible. There's usually a massive traffic backup in the mornings and evenings. The path train only goes into Hoboken about 20 blocks to the south. They have a light rail you can connect to but it's not big and doesn't run enough yet.

The LRT runs every 5-15 mins and its decently sized system , and its being expanded.... There already building up the rest of the Weehawken Waterfront will low rise structures....should be finished in 2015....

NYguy Mar 21, 2012 2:40 PM

Journal Square is a rail and bus hub for commuters, and can handle more office development than it has. However, the JC waterfront was developed as an alternative to lower Manhattan. Before that, there was not much in that area, and Journal Square was the more traditional urban center.

Back to the old failed proposal, looks as though the city wants to get something going...

http://www.nj.com/jjournal-news/inde...t_wants_d.html
Jersey City signals it wants developer of massive Journal Square project to act, or face default

http://media.nj.com/jjournal-news/ph...8408-large.jpg


March 10, 2012
By Terrence T. McDonald

Quote:

In April 2009, Jersey City Mayor Jerramiah Healy stood on a 1.5-acre site adjacent to the Journal Square PATH station and hailed an imminent twin tower project as a “great step forward” for the city. The project two towers, one 58 stories and the other 38, sitting atop a seven-story retail and parking base with a rooftop terrace would begin later that year, and be completed in three years. It’s now three years later and the site remains vacant, save for weeds and the occasional soda can or beer bottle surrounded by metal fencing.

The twin tower project appears to be nothing more than a dim fantasy, but that may all change soon. City officials say they want the heart of the city to see the same kind of development that’s occurred Downtown. “Journal Square is really the next area, and Journal Square is primed and ready for a project,” said Jersey City Redevelopment Agency Executive Director Bob Antonicello.

For years, the Journal Square project was stalled, with main investor Multi-Employer Property Trust (MEPT), of Washington, D.C., blaming the poor economy for its inability to find a partner to help it with financing, according to Antonicello. After missing an August 2011 deadline to put a shovel in the ground, and then missing a second deadline of Dec. 31, 2011, MEPT has until April Fool’s Day to get the project started in earnest, Antonicello said.

“The issue that we had really with MEPT was this process was kind of ready, aim, aim, aim, aim ... and they never fired the gun to actually go vertical,” he said. If the April 1 deadline passes without movement on the project, MEPT will be in default of its agreement with the JCRA, and the city agency can find someone else to help realize the long-awaited proposal, Antonicello added.

http://thejcra.org/jcra_files/Image/..._Rendering.jpg
http://www.thejcra.org/index.php?p=p...details&pid=17


This will probably come back to life under a new developer.

____________________________________________________


http://www.globest.com/news/12_310/n...t/-319741.html
MEPT Faces April 1 Deadline for Journal Square Project

By Antoinette Martin
March 20, 2012

Quote:

The city’s partners in a long-stalled project to revitalize Journal Square with up to 1,500 new housing units and extensive retail on a site adjacent to the PATH station will not meet an April 1 deadline for getting shovels in the ground, and have asked for another year to make good, Jersey City officials tell GlobeSt.com. The Jersey City Redevelopment Agency chief says the answer is probably no.

Antonicello says he expects to advise board members against accepting MEPT’s request for an extension after it defaults on the April 1 deadline, which has already been extended twice since last August. Once MEPT defaults, JCRA is legally entitled to consider new development partners.

“Our issues are significant,” Antonicello says. “The city and the Redevelopment Agency have done everything they can to create as much value at the Journal Square transit hub as possible. This project should have moved forward.”

______________________________________________



While that project struggles I don't think the prospects are great for seeing something happen soon with this new 82-story development. But when the redevelopment plan kicks in, Journal Square will be transformed...

http://www.thejcra.org/jcra_files/Fi...pment_Plan.pdf

http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/142206386/original.jpg



http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/142206387/original.jpg



http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/142206388/original.jpg






Quote:

Originally Posted by Towersteve (Post 5635740)
True Hoboken residents want to keep the city small. The path train only goes into Hoboken about 20 blocks to the south. They have a light rail you can connect to but it's not big and doesn't run enough yet.

Hoboken was the main terminus for NJ Transit trains (until the Midtown direct provided "direct" service into Penn Station). It's still a major hub, and there was a proposal a few years ago for a "Hudson Yards-like" development there as well. It could have been a major rival to development in Jersey City, though visibly there's no difference between the two cities from a waterfront point of view.


http://blog.nj.com/hobokennow_impact...en1_Page_4.jpg
http://www.nj.com/hobokennow/index.s...transit_r.html


Can Hoboken withstand a 75-story building?
NJ Transit proposes skyscrapers for $500M development at train tracks


By Tricia Tirella and Timothy J. Carroll
09/29/2008

Quote:

A 36-acre swath of land at the southern tip of Hoboken is an ideal location for a 75-story building, several other tall towers, and 9.2 million square feet of new development, according to NJ Transit officials and Mayor David Roberts.

Broad plans for the proposed $500 million, 20-year development were unveiled on Thursday, at the third of three public meetings held by NJ Transit to talk about their development plans for the tracks at the city's southern border. The new development would revitalize an industrial area and bring as many as 6,000 new residents to the city.

But many people believe it is out of scale for mile-square Hoboken.

At the meeting, members of a private planning firm, FXFOWLE - appointed by the city and paid for by NJ Transit - tried to convince some outraged residents that condos, office buildings, and retail and park space could "beautify the blighted area" bordering Observer Highway.

NJ Transit owns the property, but has allowed Hoboken to choose its own planning and architecture firm. The development would be completed by NJ Transit's designated company, LCOR. Mayor David Roberts said on Friday that the rail yard is a "quintessential place to put office buildings." He said that even though the proposed 75- to 80-story "signature building" for the site is about three times the height of the tallest building in Hoboken, it would be better to have it on the Hoboken side of the project than on the Jersey City side.


Needless to say, this didn't go anywhere, for now.


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Ashx4nbGYN...sit+Plan+1.PNG
http://thehobokenjournal.blogspot.co...rce-press.html


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Ashx4nbGYN...sit+Plan+2.PNG
http://thehobokenjournal.blogspot.co...rce-press.html

Nexis4Jersey Mar 21, 2012 4:07 PM

Hobokeners and NJT employees were flat out against that proposal...so it was dropped. A new Proposal was drafted a few months ago and has the approval of most residents and employees.... The Jersey City side would be better served with Monsters that tall... That plan was also supported by a corrupt Mayor who is now out of office , he didn't care for Hoboken and would let just about anything get built. The New Mayor has come out with the Plan below...it has yet to get to NJT....but seeing how Hoboken has forced NJT hand in the past several times it shouldn't be hard. The Secaucus plan that NJT had proposal died aswell , there not really that good when it comes to real estate.... There plans are often out of place and met with a firestorm of opposition.

Hoboken Terminal Yard Redevelopment Plan Second plan

summersm343 Mar 21, 2012 7:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nexis4Jersey (Post 5635907)
Hobokeners and NJT employees were flat out against that proposal...so it was dropped. A new Proposal was drafted a few months ago and has the approval of most residents and employees.... The Jersey City side would be better served with Monsters that tall... That plan was also supported by a corrupt Mayor who is now out of office , he didn't care for Hoboken and would let just about anything get built. The New Mayor has come out with the Plan below...it has yet to get to NJT....but seeing how Hoboken has forced NJT hand in the past several times it shouldn't be hard. The Secaucus plan that NJT had proposal died aswell , there not really that good when it comes to real estate.... There plans are often out of place and met with a firestorm of opposition.

Hoboken Terminal Yard Redevelopment Plan Second plan

This plan seems much more realistic than the old proposal and both of the Jersey City supertall plans. I could actually see this moving forward and this is something I can get excited about.

NYguy Mar 22, 2012 2:49 AM

Any development is good there, and I'm all about development around transit, especially rail terminals. Hoboken would have gotten the benefits if the original plans could have been built (how many towns that small could have boasted a corporate headquarters that large tower likely would have provided), but they want to linger in the shadow of Jersey City. I'm doubtful the 82-sotry proposal can get built, particularly with the original 2 tower proposal in limbo. The economy of the past few years hasn't helped many of these developments. But things are beginning to thaw all over New Jersey as projects come to life.

urbanlife Mar 26, 2012 2:07 AM

Wow, something like this would absolutely dominate the Journal Square skyline, though it would definitely be nice to see that area be much more of a hub, sort of a midtown to the waterfront downtown of Jersey City.

I am definitely gonna have to do some wandering on the Jersey side some when I get there in just over a month.

ifeeldope9779 Mar 30, 2012 3:32 PM

With the new and proposed development downtown, an increasing population in Hoboken and JC, not to mention some of the development going on in Newark, can the PATH handle the increase in ridership? Its already beyond packed during rush hour.

Roadcruiser1 Mar 30, 2012 4:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ifeeldope9779 (Post 5647476)
With the new and proposed development downtown, an increasing population in Hoboken and JC, not to mention some of the development going on in Newark, can the PATH handle the increase in ridership? Its already beyond packed during rush hour.

I am certain that things will work out. Especially since there are proposals to expand the PATH system, and the HBLR system it will work out. There has also been two other proposals that would help. The 7 line extension to New Jersey and the Gateway Project but it has to be seen which proposal would be picked.

Zerton Apr 1, 2012 1:43 AM

I love the Handel Architects proposal. The connectivity between the towers at the base looks beautiful. I Think those terraces will be very popular.


NYguy Apr 1, 2012 1:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ifeeldope9779 (Post 5647476)
can the PATH handle the increase in ridership? Its already beyond packed during rush hour.

That's an understatement. But slightly increased service will help some. What will help more is if that 7 extension to Secaucus gets built. It's currently just a study, but is being looked at as a cheaper and more practical way of getting more transit into the City from Jersey (over the canceled rail tunnel project).


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.