Millennials Continue to Leave Big Cities
 

Millennials Continue to Leave Big Cities

Census figures show smaller drop in young urban residents than previous years, but many still leaving for cheaper housing, better schools

https://www.wsj.com/articles/millenn...es-11569470460

great, so now they're killing cities too.

god, is there anything they won't kill?

thanks, millennials.


worst. generation. ever.


;)

As a Millennial (some studies consider me Gen Z, depending on what they consider 1995 to be), you couldn't pay me enough money to move to the suburbs. I'm currently living in Philadelphia and enjoying every moment of it: I live in a luxury apartment with a full view of the Center City skyline, numerous bars and restaurants are nearby, I have four full-service supermarkets within walking distance from me, and I am able to successfully live car-free. I can't imagine giving all of that up, even when kids become part of the equation.

While I can't guarantee that I'll be in Philly forever (I'm a lifer who LOVES my city, but my girl may need to pursue her Master's in another city), I can guarantee that my girl and I will be looking to live in a major city for the long-term.

Also, writing about what Millennials are doing is so 2005. Most Millennials are in their 30s now, and the younger ones--such as my girlfriend and I--are cusp babies who could be considered either Millennials or Gen Z. We're the ones who are going to jump in and continue the movement that the older Millennials started.

And how many Gen Z residents did they gain in their place?

Who cares about the population fluctuations of a particular randomly defined generational cohort?

does this merely have something to do with dips and rises in the birth patterns of these generations?

a lot of people who move to cities, it isnt really for them. meaning, for them for life. they just connect and starter family there, then move out to the burbs. same as its ever been really.

Millennials are essentially the child-bearing cohort now. Why would it be surprising that the child-bearing cohort is more likely to move to places more centered around the child-rearing phase?

Has there ever, in the history of modern U.S., been a phase when the child-bearing cohort moved from suburbs to cities? I doubt it. This is the phase when households need the most space for the least money.

Four years ago is roughly when all millennials became the age of majority, and three years ago is when the anti-immigrant mood in the U.S. went into high gear. There are no new millennials to add to cities, unless they come from other countries.

No I don’t. Never will.


I would consider buying a place in the burbs to store visiting family, but I would never live out there.


City raised children are more intelligent and progressive. It’s just better.

I don't understand these articles. Was there some assumption that every millenial that ever moved into a city would stay forever in the city? It's absurd. Millenials are now early 20s to late 30s - this is all normal life migratory patterns.

Cities will only have a problem if the generations after millennials eschew them - and I don't see that happening any time soon.

For some the city is "a phase of life".

For others the city is "a way of life".

Each generation produces plenty of both.

Why would millennials be any different?

I totally agree. To your last question - there was a rash of "Millennials are flocking to the City" articles 10 years ago and there was a decent amount of uncertainty as to how all this could/would affect the suburbs (WSJ's readership) and I look at these articles as social reassurances: "See the suburbs are fine"

I would also add- I think Millennials are somewhat different too - I bet a much higher % of millenials are choosing to raise children in the cities (still just a fraction of the overall millenial population) vs. previous generations.

Good...and take your avocado toast with you. :frog:

I'm not totally convinced there is a mass movement of millennials to the burbs. The drops could also be a factor of stricter immigration, or a decline in desire to relocate to the U.S. by foreigners. People think white American young professional when they see "millennial", but that could miss immigrants of a certain age that are moving to other parts of the world (or returning home). The big expensive cities are more dependent on foreign-born populations to grow.

I don't think mass exodus is the right term either.

I'm making these numbers up - but the trend over the years seems to be:

5% of Boomers raised children in the city, 10% of Gen Xers, and 25% of Millenials. So while, on the whole, the majority of Millenials are raising kids in the suburbs - it's still a 5 fold increase from a few decades ago which is driving significant change in cities. This, at least, seems to be the case on the East Coast.

Yeah, and Boomers probably have the lowest percentage of any modern generation. I think this story would be more interesting if it was somehow shown that Millennials are moving out of the big cities at the same rates of their predecessors, which I doubt. From my anecdotal experience, there wasn't really even a massive flow of Gen-Xers to the burbs, either. The biggest flows were Silent Generation and Baby Boomers.

When X'ers were starting out..mid 80's through the 90's, cities weren't as desirable yet. Gentrification and trendiness of urban living was in its infancy by the mid 90's.

One aspect we haven't discussed is these numbers are inclusive of everyone in that age range.

When we talk about millennials gentrifying, we're talking about a certain kind of millennial.

Cities losing a large number of working-class black/brown millennials still fit in with the overall "rise of the cities" narrative. Particularly because you can argue that the success of urban cores (which have brought up housing prices) along with the decline of inner-ring suburbia has opened up a lot of new opportunities for these folks in terms of housing.

Millennials are transitioning out of "young people" and into "middle aged"

They are the ones having kids and raising families now, the oldest millennial is about to turn 39.

This pattern change isnt surprising at all.

Funny how some of you guys are trying to deny that this is happening. As a millennial myself, I’m not phased by this. Until certain top cities like NYC, SF, LA, Boston, and others are able to advance their infrastructure to accommodate more people (including new city-dwelling millennials who aren’t caring about having kids yet), their populations should decrease or remain stagnant for a while.

Not sure if I fully agree with you; those early 80s Yuppies were already into urban living... YUPpies were Young Urban Professionals after all. And then there were the artist-types that were moving into warehouses and industrial sections of cities in the early 80s; that's how the Arts District was formed in LA. So I think by the late 1970s/early 1980s, younger people were already starting to reject the boring cookie-cutter suburbs and mall-ification that the Baby Boomers had embraced.

I'm a Gen-Xer (born in 1970), and even when I was a teen, my friends and I talked about leaving the goddamn suburbs and moving to the big city... but at the time for me, that meant an apartment or bungalow in or near West Hollywood. Maybe my generation was split between liking the suburbs and liking the city. I definitely wanted to get out of postwar-era suburbia.