Quote:
|
Quote:
One of those lines will vastly outperform the other. |
In Tyrone's defense, it isn't totally unreasonable to consider a local and express offering between downtown and the airport in the long-run. And repurposing that bridge may be one of the lowest-cost options to cross the river.
Under the basic "butts-in-seats" barometer of transit success, however, the Riverside LRT, i.e. "local" option, will vastly outperform. But it will take an 8- to 9-figure river crossing to do it, and it is highly unlikely to compete with taxis/ridesharing for anyone on a tight timeline. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Still probably not worth it, given the limited ridership airports usually have. But cheaper than a whole separate line. |
Quote:
Putting Stadler DMUs along Cap Metro ROW to the MoKan spur gets you to the Colorado river north of the port without spending a dime. Cross the river and buy some underutilized land south of there gets you virtually a straight shot into the port from the north. That is by far the cheapest way to get rail to the airport, but I thought I conceded that the demand wasn't there yet. And I also concede that no amount of downtown-airport direct express service would justify a $2B investment. But the demand doesn't need to get all that high for the numbers to possibly work if you criticize what I actually said. To that end, please try not to be so dismissive if you want to foster some good conversation on Austin transportation. |
Quote:
You're basically describing this: https://i.ibb.co/hYs2pRs/Screen-Shot...4-19-09-PM.jpg TLDR: Not really a serious discussion about using the monopolies bridge or different types of trains serving the airport which probably doesn't even need mass transit and only got it so we could pass Prop A with the voters. |
The Montopolis Bridge is being dedicated for bike / ped. It will connect the LAB to the new shared use paths along 183 and eventually trails along the south side of the Colorado River.
|
On one of my recent weekend pandemic drives, I took 183 from Cedar Park all the way south to the 130 junction. The new highway is probably 75% complete, but a lot of it is driveable. And gotta be honest, it’s fantastic. Easy, roomy — so many of the rough spots smoothed out. They’re finishing the last leg right now, from about Montopolis to 71. It was such an important part of near east side development (vs Far East, where Tesla is), it’s really going to supercharge things out that way, IMO.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
An extra river crossing for infrequent commuter frequency use, plus RoW acquisition for a whole new corridor, and less chance of a federal share, plus higher operating costs doesn't pencil out. |
Quote:
|
All that being said, I would LOVE if we could eventually get LRT down the 7th street corridor from 183 at the new regional CARTS bus depot to Mozarts at Lake Austin Blvd west of Mopac. That's a big pipe dream but that's why we have pipes. I think by that time Clark's dream of bunchable buses that use 5g might be a reality.
|
This was posted on DallasMetropolis. Not sure if it's been posted here yet.
https://virginhyperloop.com/project/texas |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What I am encouraged by is the continued talk of a need for *something* between especially DFW and Austin/San Antonio. I'm not opposed to continued development of hyperloop by any means, but HSR is a proven technology that isn't going anywhere any time soon. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Electric propulsion via capacitors re-charged at stops. Presumably they can produce some cost justification of doing this instead of plain BRT but I'm skeptical. I suppose it would be more useful than a streetcar, so maybe there's a place for this somewhere that needs route versatility or has big hills/tight corners. The website doesn't inspire much confidence. https://municipaltransitsolutions.com/ |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.