From yesterday http://buildingphilly.com/3601-market-222014/
|
Article about this breaking ground.
Quote:
|
Apparently this is also going to have a roof top pool.
http://technical.ly/philly/2014/02/0...t-residential/ |
Whoa does it can any plainer than this Uninspiring? Unimaginative? BLT how about joining the 21st Century of architecture. Good grief.
Philadelphias survival was probably helped by its amazing high quality architecture through the centuries. I cant deal with these mass produced glass boxes. :hell: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://southernland.com/wp-content/u.../09/Phili2.jpg http://southernland.com/southern-lan...pment-project/ http://southernland.com/wp-content/g...-market-st.png http://southernland.com/community-de...market-street/ http://www.gundpartnership.com/sites...4-market_0.jpg http://www.gundpartnership.com/3601-...t-Philadelphia |
Thats actually not bad now although it should be taller.
The original renderings had me worried. The diagonal placement though? This is Market St where the placement of skyscrapers has historically been E-W . I would have preferred that University City pick up fabulously laid out Center Citys skyline in its likeness but they are doing their own thing rather haphazardly imo. Center City' gave University City a 4 mile long skyline to extend and seems like Drexel is turning a blind eye to it and playing sim city. |
Eh, I don't think it's anything spectacular. But the pros (skyline, new residents, street level activity, elimination of an empty lot) FAR outweigh the cons (bland design). And while it's no Cira Center, it's no Homes2Suites* or Southstar either. I've definitely seen worse.
But I do agree that BLT probably churns out the blandest, least interesting buildings. *Walking by here the other day, the ground level is pretty decent. Just don't look up! |
Quote:
I actually think 28 floors at 320 feet is a good height for this area. I'm sure we will see even more height go up in UCity in the coming years, as we are already seeing a good number of towers as it is. The less room there is for development in UCity and the more demand that arises, the higher the towers will be. As of right now, there is plenty of room for new towers in UCity. Don't forget, the UCity Science Center does have plans for an office building at 34th and Market which will be 25-35 floors tall and could reach over 400 feet. |
[QUOTE=summersm343;6441869]I think it's one of the nicer designed towers going up in the city. IDK what your issue is with this one:
http://southernland.com/wp-content/u.../09/Phili2.jpg http://southernland.com/southern-lan...pment-project/ I think I know what Pennsgrant is talking about. It is certainly nicer than an empty lot, but can we get something a little more "original"? I'll tell you the truth, that when I first saw this rendering, I thought I was in the "1919 Market" thread. What is it with the "Bar Code" windows "look"? I can think of at least 5 that follows this same pattern: 1. Morgan Hall (Temple U.) 2. Evo's façade (yes, even Evo) although it looks like the quality of material is a plus factor. 3. 1919 Market St. 4. 1900 Arch St. 5. This one 6. There were a couple others (Drexel projects) Okay, after a while, this design gets boring. Where is the creativity anymore? Am I just a "complainer"? Maybe I am. I like FMC's New Headquarters Bldg. for one. |
Yeah I'm not a huge fan of the bar code windows. (That is a really great nick name for that, because I had no idea on how to describe that style.)
|
I actually kind of like this design, and the diagonal setting
|
Quote:
|
|
Thanks for the updates MusicMan!
They need to pick up the pace on this one! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
|
Tower crane is up. Got a pic of it that I'll post later
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 5:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.