SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/index.php)
-   Buildings & Architecture (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/forumdisplay.php?f=397)
-   -   Neo-Classical architecture from the last 50 years (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=126746)

jetsetter Mar 6, 2007 12:04 AM

Neo-Classical architecture from the last 50 years
 
In this thread I am hoping that we can post examples of Neo-classical architecture from the last 50 years. I will start with two newer examples.

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center - Washington D.C. (1998)
http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/4088/92eu2.jpg

Schermerhorn Symphony Center - Nashville, Tennessee (2006)
http://img329.imageshack.us/img329/3...g780812oo6.jpg

LMich Mar 6, 2007 3:37 AM

Michigan Hall of Justice (2002) - Lansing, Michigan - The headquarters for the Michigan Supreme Court, and other state courts.

http://www.mi.agc.org/graphics/BldMI...of-Justice.jpg

Lecom Mar 6, 2007 4:04 AM

Wow, that's some great stuff. Good thing that not all architects/developers are obsessed with contemporaty styles.

MolsonExport Mar 6, 2007 2:24 PM

Neoclassical architecture always looks imposing and timeless.

johnnypd Mar 6, 2007 3:33 PM

quite a few examples in this thread on skyscrapercity:

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=440816

this is in london for instance:

http://www.johnsimpsonarchitects.com...ages/08big.jpg

http://www.qftarchitects.net/commerc...lour_large.jpg

and of course Dresden:

http://www.neumarkt-dresden.de/image...7/feb07/q2.jpg

http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/4...150173auv0.jpg

Upward Mar 6, 2007 3:34 PM

The Nashville building is incredible! Nothing about it, at least in that picture, makes it obvious that it's new.

LostInTheZone Mar 6, 2007 6:02 PM

I wasn't sure if I wanted to be snide and post this, but someone else did Dresden...

East Front of the US Capitol, built 1958-1962:

http://www.ilovelanguages.com/Wallpa...s/capitol1.jpg

Time article from 1958:

Quote:

The current phase of the struggle began in 1955, when the House passed a $5,000,000 appropriation act (increased in 1956 by $12 million) for the expansion of the Capitol, and tied into it provisions to move the east-front wall 32½ ft. forward, replace its sandstone façade with a marble copy. Supporters of the remodeling said that it would correct an "architectural defect" (the dome overhangs the east portico), repair and halt damages caused by time and weather, make room for 42 new offices, new restaurant facilities, one large hearing room and a tourist-free corridor connecting the Senate and House. Said Architect of the Capitol J. George Stewart (no architect but a former civil engineer): "The Capitol is not a museum. It is the live seat of a great government."
original sandstone columns from the old facade were set up in the National Arboretum:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ol_Columns.jpg

jetsetter Mar 17, 2007 7:43 PM

United States Court House - White Plains, New York (1995)
http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/6...use1291mo3.jpg

kool maudit Mar 17, 2007 9:08 PM

this one is very awkward.

someone123 Mar 17, 2007 9:58 PM

That White Plains building is awful.

I'd rather have real contemporary styles than approximations of classical styles.

LMich Mar 18, 2007 12:08 AM

Yeah, it's a really brutal clash of Neoclassicism and Beaux Arts. Those styles usually work together, well, but for some reason the architect totally hit and missed, here.

holladay Mar 18, 2007 5:49 AM

Th White Plains building looks like it could topple off its base. The details and materials are just baaaaad. But that's what happens when you try to design a building to look like it has real brick and stone walls instead of just thin veneers. :yuck:

biguc Mar 18, 2007 6:24 AM

The White Plains building is disgusting.

What are those Dresden buildings, actually? Baroque? Not neo-classical, anyway.

The first three buildings in this thread aren't that great, either. The Reagan buildings is especially clumsy. The one in Nashville is ok.


But christ, I can't get over how bad that White Plains building is.

trueviking Mar 18, 2007 6:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lecom (Post 2668039)
Wow, that's some great stuff. Good thing that not all architects/developers are obsessed with contemporaty styles.

yes, some are obsessed with ancient rome.

kitsch.

holladay Mar 18, 2007 6:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trueviking (Post 2698852)
yes, some are obsessed with ancient rome.

kitsch.

yep... pastiche is the new authenticity

tackledspoon Mar 18, 2007 4:49 PM

The Dresden buildings are beautiful, but as BigUC asked, are they actually neoclassical? I'm not so learned in architecture, but I thought neoclassical threw back to roman monumental architecture.
Anyway, none of these other ones really do it for me. Capitol aside, the unfortunately named Reagan building is the most convincing and the least offensive. Nashville isn't offensive, but I could tell right off that it was a new construction. The Lansing and White Plains courthouses are both hideous.

jetsetter Mar 18, 2007 5:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tackledspoon (Post 2699356)
The Dresden buildings are beautiful, but as BigUC asked, are they actually neoclassical? I'm not so learned in architecture, but I thought neoclassical threw back to roman monumental architecture.
Anyway, none of these other ones really do it for me. Capitol aside, the unfortunately named Reagan building is the most convincing and the least offensive. Nashville isn't offensive, but I could tell right off that it was a new construction. The Lansing and White Plains courthouses are both hideous.

I have been liberal with my examples.

Exodus Mar 18, 2007 6:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trueviking (Post 2698852)
yes, some are obsessed with ancient rome.

kitsch.

Good thing too, or we would see nothing but silly attempts at being creative and futuristic. Ancient Rome Rocks !

trueviking Mar 18, 2007 6:30 PM

yes, because those are the only two options...

ancient rome does rock...in ancient rome....not in nashville.

ancient roman rocks....

http://lazytoad.com/travel/med/rome/rome-Images/74.jpg

hauntedheadnc Mar 18, 2007 7:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trueviking (Post 2699521)
yes, because those are the only two options...

ancient rome does rock...in ancient rome....not in nashville.

ancient roman rocks....

And why not Nashville? Every architecture style started somewhere, but does that mean it should have stayed there and only there? Was art deco inappropriate for New York and Chicago because it started in Paris? Is the only architecture suitable for the modern American city those buildings that look like melted trailers?

"Ancient Rome" architecture just plain works, so why not use it? There's room for variety, and why not use something that has proven its worth?


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.