SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Buildings & Architecture (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=397)
-   -   CHICAGO | St. Regis Chicago (Vista) | 1,191 FT | 101 FLOORS (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=212182)

BuildThemTaller Jun 29, 2017 2:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWILLSKYLINE (Post 7849517)
Anyone have any idea what hotel prices are going to look like? I can only assume something comparable to trump's.

I'm assuming that they will have room comparable with the other high end hotels, including the Langham, the Four Seasons, Ritz-Carlton, etc. Those are all in the $300-350 range based on a quick Google search. As someone that travels to DC quite often, those are damn good prices for a high end hotel. The GSA rate for DC is like $242 right now. Chicago is so affordable compared to its peers (DC, San Francisco, New York, etc.).

On another note, I was wondering what all of you were talking about with angled columns. DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMNNN. This is getting exciting-er. It was already exciting, but now, more so.

nergie Jun 29, 2017 2:53 PM

Angled Columns- Sorry for the poor quality photo
 
http://i.imgur.com/bQwGsQC.jpg

left of center Jun 29, 2017 8:59 PM

I know its already been said, several times already... but those angled columns...

:drooling: :slob: :yes:

The view when taking the Wacker exit from LSD is going to be jaw-dropping!

harryc Jun 30, 2017 1:15 PM

June 23


June 28
Angle Columns





Concrete Angle Columns (!)






The climbing form awaits the next floors re-bar





jc5680 Jun 30, 2017 1:57 PM

From bKL's twitter:


chris08876 Jul 1, 2017 3:07 PM

Maybe when this tower is close to topping out, one of those rooftopping folks will climb it, and do their thing. You know, gopro, and getting close to the edge with no fall protection system. The rooftoppers and train surfers are common in NY.

Neverthess, this project demonstrates what good time management and timetable progression is about. They did not hesitate or cause delays. They got right to work, and its moving quite rapidly for its magnitude.

SolarWind Jul 2, 2017 3:21 PM

June 30, 2017


harryc Jul 4, 2017 7:19 PM

July 3


Forms preceding function



denizen467 Jul 4, 2017 8:56 PM

All bow down, the frustums have landed!


^ Btw, nice wordplay Harry.

vexxed82 Jul 5, 2017 6:33 PM

Stopped by the site today for a few photos of the angles column formwork. Before I left this caught my eye:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DD_cUznUQAQ89U_.jpg:large

It looks like at least one of the core walls has a gentle slope in it. Can't remember which floor this was, but it was level with the elevated terrace of Lakeshore East.

Makes me wonder if the core walls will mimic the frustum shape, at least on the first few public/amenity floors. I guess we'll find out as the tower rises...

harryc Jul 5, 2017 6:45 PM

Words to go with the pictures....

https://chicago.curbed.com/2017/7/5/...uction-chicago

Notyrview Jul 5, 2017 6:55 PM

All around :slob::slob::slob:

kayosthery Jul 5, 2017 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vexxed82 (Post 7855515)
Stopped by the site today for a few photos of the angles column formwork. Before I left this caught my eye:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DD_cUznUQAQ89U_.jpg:large

It looks like at least one of the core walls has a gentle slope in it. Can't remember which floor this was, but it was level with the elevated terrace of Lakeshore East.

Makes me wonder if the core walls will mimic the frustum shape, at least on the first few public/amenity floors. I guess we'll find out as the tower rises...

The two exterior shear walls on the West core will slope with the building. One exterior shear wall on the East core will slope with the building.

vexxed82 Jul 6, 2017 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kayosthery (Post 7855853)
The two exterior shear walls on the West core will slope with the building. One exterior shear wall on the East core will slope with the building.

Awesome! Thanks for the info! I take it the floor above this one will tilt outwards slightly?

Also, here are a few more shots...

http://nickulivieriphotography.zenfo...04579321-5.jpg

http://nickulivieriphotography.zenfo...04579320-5.jpg

http://nickulivieriphotography.zenfo...04579895-6.jpg

http://nickulivieriphotography.zenfo...04579934-5.jpg

http://nickulivieriphotography.zenfo...04580353-5.jpg

Just for fun: Angled formwork straightened
http://nickulivieriphotography.zenfo...04580617-5.jpg

And...Vista's southern 'face'
http://nickulivieriphotography.zenfo...04580838-5.jpg

aaron38 Jul 6, 2017 1:40 PM

Shades of 150 N. Riverside. I hadn't seen anything in the renderings to suggest structure like this.

jc5680 Jul 6, 2017 1:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vexxed82 (Post 7855978)

I quite like these punchouts, particularly since you won't ever see them from the outside once the platform/deck is installed. Those kind of things usually get VE'd to oblivion.

F1 Tommy Jul 6, 2017 2:08 PM

This one is fun to watch with some rather complicated formwork. Must be a pain to fix when they make a minor mistake.

Kenmore Jul 6, 2017 2:14 PM

sickness^

LouisVanDerWright Jul 6, 2017 2:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aaron38 (Post 7856383)
Shades of 150 N. Riverside. I hadn't seen anything in the renderings to suggest structure like this.

You haven't? This lobby rendering has been posted several times recently:

https://www.vistatowerchicago.com/wp.../wanda-171.jpg
vistatowerchicago.com

Apparently there will be not one, but two sets of angled columns here supporting the little bump out in the middle at the base. Upon further examination it appears that the columns being framed out now might actually be the less severe set as well which means we could be seeing some really wild engineering once they get around to the next set.

vexxed82 Jul 6, 2017 2:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aaron38 (Post 7856383)
Shades of 150 N. Riverside. I hadn't seen anything in the renderings to suggest structure like this.

They're not necessarily a major structural component of the entire structure. From what I gather, these angled beams will make up the lobby/amenity portion of the hotel - or that small box that seems to hang from the bottom of the middle tower

http://studiogang.com/img/RTRwUWFNR2...ment-group.jpg

http://loopchicago.com/_files/images...a_render_3.jpg

http://loopchicago.com/_files/images...a_render_2.jpg

http://bklarchitecture.com/wp-conten...ue3_bKL_bT.jpg

the urban politician Jul 6, 2017 3:07 PM

It's going to be an epic lobby and a great place to grab a drink, possibly rivaling that of the Hyatt Regency

vexxed82 Jul 6, 2017 3:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright (Post 7856491)
You haven't? This lobby rendering has been posted several times recently:

Apparently there will be not one, but two sets of angled columns here supporting the little bump out in the middle at the base. Upon further examination it appears that the columns being framed out now might actually be the less severe set as well which means we could be seeing some really wild engineering once they get around to the next set.

I did come across this image, too, but not sure how accurate or up to date it is. In the article, it credits "Wanda Institute of Hotel Design & Research Co." http://stmedia.com/files/editorial/b..._Chicago_2.jpg

F1 Tommy Jul 6, 2017 4:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vexxed82 (Post 7856548)
I did come across this image, too, but not sure how accurate or up to date it is. In the article, it credits "Wanda Institute of Hotel Design & Research Co." http://stmedia.com/files/editorial/b..._Chicago_2.jpg

I think that is the same as the other renderings, but showing more detail. From the pictures it looks like the south side of the building will also get these??

Bonsai Tree Jul 6, 2017 4:43 PM

Wait a minute...

Is that Water Tower Place and the John Hancock Center in the background on the far right. That doesn't make any sense. From what imaginary angle are they getting this rendering from? Seems like another example of stupid rendering design. This should be up there with the North/South Sunrise and 3 Car Train in Wolf Point. :???::???:

Via Chicago Jul 6, 2017 5:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bonsai Tree (Post 7856626)
Wait a minute...

Is that Water Tower Place and the John Hancock Center in the background on the far right. That doesn't make any sense. From what imaginary angle are they getting this rendering from? Seems like another example of stupid rendering design. This should be up there with the North/South Sunrise and 3 Car Train in Wolf Point. :???::???:

yes they photoshopped in a different view than what will exist in reality

harryc Jul 6, 2017 5:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Via Chicago (Post 7856664)
yes they photoshopped in a different view than what will exist in reality

Probably to avoid showing the tower that shall not be named.

very very very cool lobby. Thick, angled, concrete support beams.

aaron38 Jul 6, 2017 6:43 PM

It's been a while since I'd looked at the lobby. Guess I forgot about those 45 degree columns.

LouisVanDerWright Jul 6, 2017 8:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kayosthery (Post 7855853)
The two exterior shear walls on the West core will slope with the building. One exterior shear wall on the East core will slope with the building.

OMG, I just realized that the stripes in the original drawing were actually literally just this crazy undulating sheer wall but exposed through or highlighted by the glass:

http://img.news.sina.com/business/p/...0709095107.jpg
news.sina.com


The little punch outs we see in this photo are just the balconies on the rendering. This is literally two giant cores that run the width of the building from North to South. I wonder how visible these cores will be if they are clad? Look at how noticible the concrete sheer wall is in this photo:

http://nickulivieriphotography.zenfo...04580353-5.jpg
Nick's photo

This has the potential to be some crazy structural expressionism if it's at all exposed.

vexxed82 Jul 6, 2017 9:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright (Post 7856938)
OMG, I just realized that the stripes in the original drawing were actually literally just this crazy undulating sheer wall but exposed through or highlighted by the glass:

http://img.news.sina.com/business/p/...0709095107.jpg
news.sina.com


The little punch outs we see in this photo are just the balconies on the rendering. This is literally two giant cores that run the width of the building from North to South. I wonder how visible these cores will be if they are clad? Look at how noticible the concrete sheer wall is in this photo:

http://nickulivieriphotography.zenfo...04580353-5.jpg
Nick's photo

This has the potential to be some crazy structural expressionism if it's at all exposed.

Interesting observation. However, the more recent, final, design does not have as many balconies - and none on the Northern face, particularly at these lower levels.

https://www.chicagoarchitecture.org/...udio-Gang1.jpg

What's weird to me is how beefy and dense this exterior wall is. In the new renders it doesn't look like these punch outs would be necessary. Time will tell.

Basically, had they never released an updated design, I'd say you're 100% correct. Maybe it'll make more sense after a few more floors because I'm stumped.

pilsenarch Jul 7, 2017 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright (Post 7856938)
OMG, I just realized that the stripes in the original drawing were actually literally just this crazy undulating sheer wall but exposed through or highlighted by the glass... This is literally two giant cores that run the width of the building from North to South. I wonder how visible these cores will be if they are clad? ...

This has the potential to be some crazy structural expressionism if it's at all exposed.

yeah, except it's not exposed... have you guys seen some of the floor plans? it's astonishing how little vision glass/windows are located in many of the interiors due to the apparently necessary volume of the structural concrete... if the MASSIVE amount of concrete was exposed, maybe it could have joined our other structurally expressive towers, Sears and Hancock (even if in this case it's not necessarily form following function)...

this is NOT a glass tower surrounding a traditional concrete column/slab structure, it's a massive concrete sculpture in hiding... what I am most excited about seeing during construction is the exposed concrete forms... I suspect it will be much more aesthetically satisfying for me than the final product...

HomrQT Jul 7, 2017 2:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by harryc (Post 7856714)
Probably to avoid showing the tower that shall not be named.

very very very cool lobby. Thick, angled, concrete support beams.

If having a view of the Trump Tower hurt chances of buying then no one would buy in any tall building in the city. More likely they found a quick picture and just threw it in to get a render out because it ultimately doesn't matter.

Rocket49 Jul 7, 2017 2:35 AM

I wonder if the fact that Trump has trademarked his name might be an issue.

Since the image is related to sales material, perhaps the Trump Organization would ask for compensation to grant permission to have "Trump" in the image

vexxed82 Jul 7, 2017 3:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pilsenarch (Post 7857273)
yeah, except it's not exposed... have you guys seen some of the floor plans? it's astonishing how little vision glass/windows are located in many of the interiors due to the apparently necessary volume of the structural concrete... if the MASSIVE amount of concrete was exposed, maybe it could have joined our other structurally expressive towers, Sears and Hancock (even if in this case it's not necessarily form following function)...

this is NOT a glass tower surrounding a traditional concrete column/slab structure, it's a massive concrete sculpture in hiding... what I am most excited about seeing during construction is the exposed concrete forms... I suspect it will be much more aesthetically satisfying for me than the final product...

Well said. The concrete super-structure is going to be far more interesting than I originally imagined. Here's hoping the facade doesn't get started too soon so we can appreciate the bones for a bit.

spidey7312 Jul 7, 2017 3:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rocket49 (Post 7857399)
I wonder if the fact that Trump has trademarked his name might be an issue.

Since the image is related to sales material, perhaps the Trump Organization would ask for compensation to grant permission to have "Trump" in the image

They would have just used a picture taken before the Trump logo was put on the building to avoid that.

BVictor1 Jul 9, 2017 6:05 PM

07/07/17

https://im1.shutterfly.com/ng/servic...623439/enhance

qDot Jul 10, 2017 4:54 PM

So it seems wanda is running into money troubles.

https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.re.../idUSKBN19V06E

LouisVanDerWright Jul 10, 2017 5:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qDot (Post 7860344)
So it seems wanda is running into money troubles.

https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.re.../idUSKBN19V06E

I have a different take on this: Wanda is exhibiting a rare case restraint among Chinese mega firms. There is a storm brewing in China, there has been for years. The government is just good at finding Illinois style ways of drop kicking the can down the road. The real question is what the hell is Sunac thinking? They have been struggling with severe issues themselves and now are gobbling up Wanda's most whimsical bullshit projects. I mean really? Who fixates of competition with Disney theme parks? It's not like theme parks are even valuable as stand alone entities without a larger franchise supporting them. This is another case of Chinese firms missing the essence of American capitalism in a race to compete everywhere in everything. Competition is essential to our system, but competition does not merely entail copying other business models, it's just as essential to innovate as it is to understand existing businesses. Trying to out Disney Disney will never be successful unless they can grow a new audience or franchise or cultural business model from scratch that Disney doesn't already have 100 years or experience honing or fine tuning.

Anyhow I've read the details on the assets dumped by Wanda and they are most non performing or low performance properties. This isn't a sale of desperation, it's a sale of Wanda's trash to some suckers who have been on an endless acquisition spree and think it's treasure.

harryc Jul 10, 2017 5:38 PM

Nine from the ninth
 
July 9




Columns supporting the parking/driveway


Patterns on patterns




quite a large gap for these forms - to accommodate the angled core ?


The slope on the core is not an illusion.


Screens waiting



camdoodlebop Jul 10, 2017 8:27 PM

what happens if a company goes bankrupt halfway through building a skyscraper? with the spire they only were at the basement level so it's less of an eyesore, but imagine something 500 feet tall and abandoned

Chi-Sky21 Jul 10, 2017 8:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by camdoodlebop (Post 7860712)
what happens if a company goes bankrupt halfway through building a skyscraper? with the spire they only were at the basement level so it's less of an eyesore, but imagine something 500 feet tall and abandoned

Look up the history of Waterview tower...happened just down the river.

KWILLSKYLINE Jul 10, 2017 9:51 PM

Isn't this one already fully financed by vista company?

TimeAgain Jul 10, 2017 11:24 PM

This building already has a construction loan.

TimeAgain Jul 10, 2017 11:32 PM

This project already has a construction loan.

left of center Jul 10, 2017 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21 (Post 7860717)
Look up the history of Waterview tower...happened just down the river.

Really wished that one got completed as designed. I know pomo gets a bad rap on these boards, but I think Teng did a great job designing it (especially the crown). They just sucked at financing and managing the construction. The recession definitely didn't help either.

chicubs111 Jul 11, 2017 1:10 AM

^ Yea it was unfortunate...it was a really good design and crown was really well done and differs from the so many flat top roofs in most modern high rises in this city built.

modonne0 Jul 11, 2017 2:18 AM

Vista Tower
 
Long time lurker, first time poster. I hope I did this right.

I know it is ZeroHedge, which a kind of a fringe site, but they are reporting that Wanda Group is liquidating assets to pay down debt.

They sold 76 hotels and a major chunk of 13 tourism projects for $9.3B and will use the proceeds to pay down debt. I wonder how this will affect the Vista Tower?

From the Article....

"The man who declared war on Disneyland just opened the world’s largest indoor ski resort. And now he’s being forced to sell it.

As the South China Morning Post reports, Wanda City, the $6 billion resort development built by China’s wealthiest tycoon Wang Jianlin, opened for business two weeks ago. The resort, which, at 1.6 square kilometres, is the world’s largest indoor ski park."

The article is titled, "China's Richest Man Forced To Sell World's Largest Indoor Ski Resort 2 Weeks After It Opened." It is from the Tyler's at ZeroHedge and was published 7.10.17.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-0...s-after-it-ope

marothisu Jul 11, 2017 3:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by modonne0 (Post 7861082)
Long time lurker, first time poster. I hope I did this right.

I know it is ZeroHedge, which a kind of a fringe site, but they are reporting that Wanda Group is liquidating assets to pay down debt.

They sold 76 hotels and a major chunk of 13 tourism projects for $9.3B and will use the proceeds to pay down debt. I wonder how this will affect the Vista Tower?

It won't. They already have a construction loan for $700M (which is nearly 80% of the estimated cost of the overall project) and are partnering with Magellan on this thing. That's a lot of properties to sell but they will still have more properties after this than they sell. Also had over $200M of condos under contract as of numerous months ago. Not sure what the number is now.

officeworker Jul 11, 2017 11:07 AM

7/10
 
http://i.imgur.com/5IvwMWgh.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/GJgYbKph.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/d5pMNbMh.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/WyTFrCmh.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/rsZyS1Uh.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/zv2mRoch.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/vb6k7TKh.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/sPFcFH2h.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/pcvXfUhh.jpg

harryc Jul 11, 2017 12:14 PM

Nice update Office Worker - ty

Notyrview Jul 11, 2017 12:34 PM

More :slob::slob::slob:


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.