#1 Sacramento
#2 St. Louis #3 Cincinnati #4 San Antonio (Not predicting in any particular order) although Sacramento has a strong brand in the Republic FC, a large USL fan base, shovel ready stadium, youth soccer academy, jersey sponsorship and a diverse ownership group with deep pockets. I think the MLS would pass over Sacramento given its proximity to San Jose (MSL Earthquakes) except that Sacramento has reached every expansion benchmark the MLS has asked for; making it difficult for MLS to say no. I think San Antonio, Cincinnati and St. Louis are all markets MLS is interested in expanding in sooner rather than later so my guess is that this will be the four expansion markets. We'll see soon enough. |
SA FC looks promising!
|
If the Crew does move to Autin, kiss MLS in SA goodbye:
http://www.espnfc.com/columbus-crew-...n-to-austin-tx Sports in SA is looking grim right now. Lost the Missions, Sold the Stars, and now Austin may get the MLS Franchise many here hoped for. |
1. Property in downtown Austin is very expensive for soccer stadium. Owner wants a downtown Stadium.
2. Austin is Longhorn country plain and simple. |
1. We are not building a DT stadium. Ours is well Northeast of DT
2. If an established club sees a city with no stadium more viable than one that has a stadium, seventy miles away, then MLS doesn't see us as viable either. 3. San Antonio is Spurs country plain and simple. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That said, I do agree it will be very hard to get a stadium built downtown given the current and planned development. I honestly don't know where they would put it - but never say never. Austin has had success with the Express in Round Rock and both the Stars/Spurs in Cedar Park, so city leaders could convince MLS to build outside of downtown. Austin's been waiting for a pro franchise for a very long time. I can see this happening. The ESPN article quoted the owner saying he would move if he couldn't get a new stadium deal. I've lived in SA long enough to have heard that said about us before (looking at you Raiders). This could be a case of MLS using Austin as other pro franchises have used SA. But my gut tells me to believe their is serious interest in moving the franchise to Austin and if that happens you can absolutely say goodbye to any chance of SA getting an MLS team. Which is disappointing. I really think MLS would do great in SA. |
Quote:
So, yes. We lose. |
Quote:
GO SPURS GO!!!!!!!!:cheers: |
Quote:
And yes Go Spurs Go!!!:cheers: |
Quote:
|
The City of Austin wasn't making any effort to get a MLS franchise, and there doesn't appear to have been any significant private effort to get a franchise. This just fell into Austin's lap so to speak, like the F1 track. Even with a team almost being handed to Austin, I don't think there will be enough public support to get it done. At this point I still think it's more likely that S.A. will land a team before Austin.
|
I believe Triple-A is better baseball:
Triple-A: A mixture of the game’s most major league-ready prospects, 4-A players, career minor leaguers, and the non-official “taxi squad” players for a major league organization. Double-A: The entrance to the “upper minors,” the jump to Double-A tends to be the most difficult for prospects, and tells us the most about them. https://www.fangraphs.com/tht/unders...league-levels/ |
Quote:
It doesn't really matter, as once again we settle for less than the top league. |
I believe that too
Quote:
To be fair though, I didn't follow the Stars much, and it doesn't seem much of San Antonio did either. |
Quote:
GO SPURS GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! COACH POPOVICH FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!:cheers: YESSSSS SIR!!!!!!!:tup: FAIRNESS-DIVERSITY-HUMILITY:yes: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://woai.iheart.com/content/2017...managed_social "Had Bexar County been made aware of such a rights, we would not have invested in Toyota Field," Wolff wrote. When asked if the idea of an expansion big league franchise in San Antonio is 'dead,' he replied "it sure sounds like it to me.'" |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is getting to seem defeatist. "We need Austin to agree to a regional airport"; "We need Austin for a major sports franchise"; We need Austin...ad nauseum". As a couple of our posters point out, whom I probably don't agree with on much, we are not Austin. They don't want to blend South, and I don't want to blend North. So, can we stop with the "regional" nonsense, and try to be a city of San Antonio, by San Antonio? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 1:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.