Sorry, but I still don't get why some of you were so excited about the first design. Especially since it is right next door to the Canopy.
That first design would not have filled out that corner the way the second, and certainly the current design does. It would have been out of place. Those that like the first design, can you give SPECIFIC reasons other than it was unique, (how so?), or "ground breaking", (again, how so, seemed pretty ordinary to me)? I'll agree, the river level looked very nice in the first renderings, but I have no reason to believe that will not be the case in the final form. |
^^ For lack of a better descriptive, it looked like a giant picture frame encasing the building and attracting your eye. The material looked like it would have been top notch (at least in the renderings). It was unique in that no other building looks anything like it, but in a good way... not in a shiny glass "look at me" way. There's too much glass in cities already... San Antonio doesn't need a bunch of glass buildings for them to be noticed and respected. People put too much stock in glass. Glass doesn't necessarily make it good or modern. It was elegant and simple but certainly not plain. To make an analogy, to me it fit of the mold of, "Don't tell people you're smart, just be smart and they'll think it for themselves." People would have been taking pictures of it and posting them on Instagram (or wherever) much more than will happen with the approved version.
|
Quote:
This new design is very pretty. And I think they changed it because of the changing architectural landscape and desire for more glass – something I believe the frost tower had much influence on. If the Hilton Canopy took place a 1 year later, I bet there would have been more glass, but at current, I am not unhappy with the design. It's one of my favorite projects right now. |
The first design was just very beautiful and different to me. Would have been perfect just needed to be a little taller imo. The second one is great, however. I still really like this project and hopefully it’s a design catalyst for that area.
|
Quote:
|
@restless 1, nothing to really "get". We can all share what we think here. But remember, they are opinions. Not right, not wrong.p Personally I like taking them all in weather I agree or not.
|
Same here. I appreciate all opinions. I also appreciate all respect for each other.
|
^
|
That was just a comment on how it's good when everybody shows each other respect. That's something that's good about this forum. Everybody here loves buildings and construction. That's our shared nerd superpower and it's a good one.
|
Sorry Jack, I meant to give a arrow with a thumbs up sign! Dont know why it put the question marks?!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I agree with you on your statements! Two thoughts: We are San Antonio, and not Dallas, Houston or especially Austin. You can clump these three cities together, but San Antonio is "different, historical, and unique" :cheers: And who said bigger and taller is better?:cheers: |
Quote:
|
Also agree! Theses developments IMO are currently the best things going not just in TX, but pretty much a anywhere!
|
Quote:
I hope the project works, but obviously the first interation didn’t pencil out, so we’ll see. |
Quote:
|
0h, I'm pretty sure I'll like it!
|
Quote:
As that process moves forward, change is inevitable, so just that there’s not a whole lot of point debating which of those two designs are better. But, as I write this I realize how curmudgeonly I sound, and really it’s fun to talk about cool stuff in SA, so just ignore me and carry on. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So, as you stated, 3 designs: 1st one by Overland (nice) 2nd one by ? (to me, it looked like an in-house quick-to-get-approval scheme) 3rd one by the current architect (very nice) |
100% Design Drawings hit the streets last week and this project is going into budgetary round. Estimated construction start is being listed as Jan 2019.
|
Sweet! When do you think we'll be able to see those?
|
Where did the 210 foot height come from?
|
Here are the elevations for The Floodgate development.
198 ft to the roof and 215 ft to the mechanical roof/crown. |
This area is going to be really something special in three years. Sad to see Bella on the River go, though. I hope the integrity of the area remains with new development.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
WOW!!! I had no idea Commerce Street was turning into a Sixth Street in Austin, with all the late night puking going on!!! LOL!!:haha: Fryguy, Bella has not closed, it is simply relocating. That is all. Still excellent food from Bella to be had by all!!!:cheers: |
I meant the area facing the River. Yes, the street side is gross. I just love the trees and the beautiful ambience of the restaurant. Best restaurant in SA
|
Girls, you're both pretty. Can we move on now?
|
The Historic Commission has given another approval for this project. Developer wants to start construction in October or November. Final approval will probably come by end of summer, which is nearby!
The article is on mysa.com Can someone please post the article? This one is getting built.:cheers: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
They have begin site work. You can see it on the Canopy Cam.
|
Quote:
Ha! If you watch the timelapse, you can see that the graffiti appeared pretty recently. |
Quote:
|
|
I believe what you're seeing is renovation work on the Witte Building, not the Floodgate. The four rooftops that are now visible between the Canopy and Witte (the Esquire rooftop is covered by Canopy) is where the Floodgate will eventually go up.
|
Preliminary HDRC agenda for:
December 05, 2018 Address/Description: 139 E COMMERCE ST 141 E COMMERCE ST 106 RIVERWALK 143 E COMMERCE ST 145 E COMMERCE ST 147 E COMMERCE ST 149 E COMMERCE ST 151 E COMMERCE ST Landmark Name:Commercial Building RIO District:RIO-3 Applicant: Keller Henderson/Keller Henderson Interiors Request: Demolition with new construction of seventeen story residential tower City Council Dist.: 1 |
From SA Heron-
https://saheron.com/renderings-show-...er-river-walk/ Henderson has not responded to interview requests from the Heron, but in 2017, he told the San Antonio Express-News that rents would be priced around $4 a square foot. That would make them the most expensive apartments in San Antonio. Doing the math, that comes out to $2,988 a month for the smallest apartment (747 square feet) and $7,696 for the largest penthouse (1,924 square feet). |
Floodgate Rendering
|
Quote:
|
I liked the original best, but this looks good too.
|
Quote:
|
Wow!!!!! Home run after home run here is SA!
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.