why wouldn't the core go vertical that is what is happening at block 37 and it doesn't look like they have excavated at all
|
BVic, you're saying that they're basically stopping work on building up the core until the surrounding excavation is done?
|
Quote:
If you look at how fast they have been building that core, if the sides move anywhere as quickly, they will catch up with the core quite quickly. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
So even if Waterview doesn't break street level until they get the rest of the foundation underway, we are still going to have an interesting few weeks because, if what Bvic said ends up being the case, then they should be getting pretty close to starting to excavate the rest of the site. |
Quote:
|
:previous: He might have taken them. He lives in Chicago according to his location.
|
Quote:
|
|
I dunno Bvic, once they pour the concrete on the rebar they have up already, the core will be pretty close to level with Wacker. All they need is one more level and Waterview will be pretty clearly above the street level. Maybe they'll keep working on the core as they continue excavating the sides, I don't see why they wouldn't do that.
|
Quote:
|
WOW! That's crazy! They are sure moving right along on this thing, are you guys sure that the core won't catch up with Trump at some point?
|
-So they've changed plans from having four to two floors below street level?
|
I talked to one of the workers at the site last week, and he said 4 levels below street level...although he also mentioned that there would be below-ground parking as well, and that was news to me.
|
-Sorry, I didn't look at the construction photos closely enough. They have in fact already poured three levels of the core, one more to upper Wacker and that's four...
|
Layman's question:
In a building like Waterview Tower, about what % of the buildings load is supported by the core? And do buildings typically have just 1 core? Or might one with a bigger footprint have more? |
^^ those are Very good questions
|
^ The fewer cores, the more rentable / saleable space, so even with a big footprint / taller building there will be a bigger core but not multiple cores. A rare example of multiple cores is MoMo, but that's structurally two buildings (that fuse higher up) anyway.
Of course if by 'bigger footprint' you mean the Merchandise Mart, then yes, of course there will be multiple cores, but then we're not talking highrises anymore. |
I believe that the reason we are seeing fewer multiple cores, actually, is that each core must have two stairwells. In the old days--I don't know when this regulation came into effect--you'd have two or three cores in apartment buildings to give you more apartments with E-W or N-S views. Most "commieblocks" have multiple cores because of the shape of the building, too...
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 2:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.