Originally Posted by wwmiv (Post 9336012)

Exactly what is wrong with my response and what do you mean by “this type” exactly?

I was being entirely serious with my answer to an entirely serious question.

In all likelihood it WILL be 15-20 years more. We’ve still got a few years left of the currently under construction phases, and two more phases still in planning that, cumulatively, are larger than everything already finished or currently in construction. The final phase being significantly more complex than any of the others, as well. The park and all of its phases aren’t fully funded (though mostly so), and politicians have been tinkering around the margins of the plans for a decade now. There’ve already been delays to do with cost, and to do with historic finds, which prolongs the construction process of course (and anyone who thinks we were gonna run into these problems wasn’t being clear eyed at the start—it should be reasonably expected that we’d have these problems).

Really, I wanna ask you: was YOUR response to ME necessary? Frankly, your comment is the rude one.

Originally Posted by sirkingwilliam (Post 9336026)

It will not be 15-20 more years. The absurdity in that estimate is why I asked that question. I don’t think asking if that comment was necessary is rude. You can however, have the right to feel different.

This will be my last comment on this particular topic.

Originally Posted by wwmiv (Post 9336050)

Basic debate: state a position and then SUPPORT your position with evidence. Where’s your evidence? Or it is just “absurd” without needing any evidence.


How you remain a moderator I will never know. I’ve reported you yet again for the personal attacks.

Originally Posted by sirkingwilliam (Post 9336070)

I guess I’ve remained a moderator all these years because I’ve done the job well and correctly. :shrug:

I’m sorry you felt the need to report me, however, nowhere did I personally attack you.

Originally Posted by wwmiv (Post 9336078)

Again. And I’ll keep doing it every time I feel you step out of line. Which admittedly is way less than it used to be. Kudos.

Originally Posted by Spoiler (Post 9336220)

Considering that phase 4 of the project (Cesar Chavez to Guadalupe) is currently buried under parking lots, with planning still in development, numerous property owners to negotiate with, and no funding, 10-15 years seems like a reasonable estimate.

Originally Posted by Spoiler (Post 9336220)

Considering that phase 4 of the project (Cesar Chavez to Guadalupe) is currently buried under parking lots, with planning still in development, numerous property owners to negotiate with, and no funding, 10-15 years seems like a reasonable estimate.

Originally Posted by sirkingwilliam (Post 9336293)

Again, from my own personal knowledge, complete build out will not take that long.

But hey, what do I know. :tup:

Originally Posted by kingkirbythe.... (Post 9336483)

I’m so sorry. I shouldn’t have asked. :(

Originally Posted by kingkirbythe.... (Post 9429663)

Design plans for third phase of San Pedro Creek project get go-ahead

https://sanantonioreport.org/design-...-get-go-ahead/

The Historic and Design Review Commission (HDRC) on Wednesday approved design plans for the third section of the San Pedro Creek Culture Park, a multi-phased project that began in 2017.

Plans submitted to the commission by John Mize, managing principal of the firm FPC, detailed the proposed landscaping, pedestrian paths, lighting, and signage for phase 3 of the project which spans from the Union Pacific Railroad bridge just north of Cevallos Street to the Apache-Alazan Creek at Interstate 35.

It also included specifications for site paving, flood control, and low-impact development features for a segment of the creek.