PDA

View Full Version : Halifax real estate business overcomes planning woes


skyscraper_1
Nov 1, 2007, 4:50 PM
Halifax real estate business overcomes planning woes — annual report
By BRUCE ERSKINE Business Reporter
Thu. Nov 1 - 7:21 AM

The commercial real-estate market in Halifax remains strong, despite the lack of a coherent municipal development plan, says Bob Mussett, senior vice-president with CB Richard Ellis Ltd. in Halifax.

"The issue that jumped off the page in 2003, and I’m sorry to say still does in 2007, is the mess that is the HRM development policy," he said Wednesday in Halifax while delivering the firm’s fifth annual regional market outlook.

"By making development so very difficult in this city, we’re effectively telling the development community, both locally and from afar, not to bother — we have no interest in innovation or creativity."

Development in downtown Halifax has been subject in recent years to opposition from heritage groups that have fought high-rise projects they say are out of sync with the city’s historic character. That opposition has led, in part, to urban sprawl that has taxed municipal services.

Mr. Mussett said the opposition to increased downtown density is ironic, since density would help address increasing concerns about sustainable development.

"More aggressive density and height allocations will in fact set the stage for economically sustainable development, saving historic buildings, not demolishing them, adding housing and people to the centre of the city, creating new employment opportunities," he said.

"Density is green, higher buildings housing more people will limit the urban sprawl. HRM’s long-term plans say we need 25,000 more people living on the peninsula. That would be great and I agree, but that will only happen with a dramatic change in our approach."

Mr. Musset said the real estate sector is facing increased consumer pressure to be more environmentally sensitive and that greater downtown density would decrease the need for cars and transportation systems that contribute to global warming.

"You’re either going to put 25,000 people on the peninsula or you’re going to put them outside of the city somewhere and they can drive in every day," he said. "It’s our choice."

Despite those concerns and other issues such as the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis, Mr. Mussett said 2007 has been a good year for the local industry and that 2008 looks promising.

"Record corporate profits have been the main driver for real estate in the last year," he said, noting that the office vacancy rate in Halifax’s central business district has dropped from 13.5 per cent to 5.5 per cent in the past three years.

"This, we expect, will drop further," he said, adding that HRM’s overall office vacancy rate is projected to decline from 8.5 per cent to 8.1 per cent by the end of the year, driven by the arrival of financial services companies such as Citco and Butterfield and mixed commercial-retail developments such as Dartmouth Crossing.

Blake Hutcheson, CB Richard Ellis’s president and CEO for Canada and Latin America, said Canada’s economic and real estate fundamentals are strong but he advised caution, noting that the subprime mortgage issue has prompted a U.S. housing slump that is hurting Canadian exporters and could affect the entire real-estate industry.

"It doesn’t take long in the information age for Wall Street to pick up on a weakness and all of the sudden the real estate market isn’t just residential, it’s commercial, it’s everything that touches real estate," he said, noting that while business is still good, CB Richard Ellis’s stock price has dropped 40 per cent in the past three months, from $42 to $25 a share.

"That is indicative of what’s happening right across the board. The elephant in the room is that issue. We’ve got to focus on it. It’s very real."

http://www.thechronicleherald.ca/Business/975728.html

Halifax Hillbilly
Dec 4, 2007, 2:30 PM
Halifax real estate business overcomes planning woes — annual report
By BRUCE ERSKINE Business Reporter
Thu. Nov 1 - 7:21 AM

Development in downtown Halifax has been subject in recent years to opposition from heritage groups that have fought high-rise projects they say are out of sync with the city’s historic character. That opposition has led, in part, to urban sprawl that has taxed municipal services.
http://www.thechronicleherald.ca/Business/975728.html

I don't agree with this statement at all. The lack of high-rise projects in the downtown has very little to do with the sprawl on the edge of Halifax. Most homeowners can not afford to live in the central city, or choose to live in the suburbs. Highrises will not change that fact. Addressing edge sprawl will be addressed both by building better suburban communities and by providing housing in the urban core.

This whole argument about heritage vs. height is so ridiculous from both sides. A lot of the same developers claiming they're fighting for sustainable urban growth by proposing high-rises are the same groups building subdivisions on the fringe that can't even be properly served by transit. Take a look at some of the stuff that Greater Homes is building and tell me if they are truly interested in sustainable urbanism, or if they are just looking to make a boat-load of money by building the Twisted Sisters.

someone123
Dec 4, 2007, 5:53 PM
I agree that the "heritage vs height" argument is ridiculous, but I don't agree that downtown highrises have nothing to do with sprawl. Long approval times drive up costs, meaning that downtown housing becomes more expensive and fewer people can afford to move there. To some degree housing demand in the city is inelastic from the point of view of how much is built so it either goes downtown or in the suburbs. Not everybody would be willing to buy downtown condos but maybe this total is 5% instead of 10% because of the restricted supply.

As for the criticism that the same developers who build downtown build in the suburbs, well, the same applies. They go where the money is, just as buyers go where the housing is. If the regulatory regime in the downtown area were more sensible there would be more opportunity to build.

Halifax Hillbilly
Dec 6, 2007, 4:11 AM
I agree that the "heritage vs height" argument is ridiculous, but I don't agree that downtown highrises have nothing to do with sprawl. Long approval times drive up costs, meaning that downtown housing becomes more expensive and fewer people can afford to move there. To some degree housing demand in the city is inelastic from the point of view of how much is built so it either goes downtown or in the suburbs. Not everybody would be willing to buy downtown condos but maybe this total is 5% instead of 10% because of the restricted supply.


I don't agree with stating that new housing either goes into the downtown or it goes in the suburbs. There are so many opportunity sites in this city to put significant amounts of housing: downtown, north end, downtown Dartmouth, brownfields near the Forum, Penhorn Mall, Shannon Park, etc. There are huge amounts of undeveloped land on the peninsula alone that even at moderate densities could accomodate thousands. Why are we told the choice is 5000 new residents in downtown high-rises or else we are contributing to urban sprawl?