PDA

View Full Version : Portland is up for sale, outside investors want in


MarkDaMan
Aug 3, 2007, 3:32 PM
Outside investors eye second-tier Portland
Daily Journal of Commerce
by Kennedy Smith
08/03/2007


Portland is up for sale.

In the last few months, two major real estate transactions have signaled a change in the city, where outside investors that have historically gravitated toward larger West Coast cities like Los Angeles and Seattle are beginning to see Portland as a viable moneymaker.

In July, 19 stories of the 30-story KOIN Center were sold for $108 million to California investment group CommonWealth Partners. Then just a couple of weeks later, development firm Gerding Edlen sold Brewery Blocks 1, 4 and 5 – a total of 660,000 square feet – to buyers represented by New York’s JPMorgan Asset Management. The price tag: a whopping $291.6 million.

David Hill, vice president of investment at Grubb & Ellis, whose firm was not part of either deal, says the transactions indicate Portland is priming itself to eventually transition from a second-tier market to a first-rate investment hub.

“We’re in an environment where people are trading real estate more,” he says. “As you have an appreciating market versus a flat one, there are going to be more people looking at their investments and saying, ‘We can get something for trade.’ A lot of the larger local owners have held real estate for so long. ... But now that we’re getting some outside groups more inclined to invest, it’s looking more desirable to sell.”

DJC: The Brewery Blocks sale and the KOIN Tower sale were two huge transactions. One of the interesting things is that both of the owners sold to out-of-state investors. What implications does that have for Portland?

David Hill: There are a couple things going on. There’s so much demand for investment real estate right now nationally that national companies are reaching outside the normal, premium markets like Washington, D.C., New York and Los Angeles. Portland has shown to be of very strong interest, and there’s high demand to invest here.

DJC: What happened to Portland that has made it so desirable?

Hill: There seems to be a trend of investing on the coasts. In real estate, a lot of the money is concentrated on the East and West Coast. When you look there, there are only so many opportunities to invest money. These other markets are becoming very expensive. As expensive Portland looks right now, it’s a deal relative to some of the other markets.

But also, the trends in Portland are positive. We’ve got strong land-use, good transportation programs; job growth has been better than most areas. Even when our economy wasn’t doing great a few years back, we still had in-migration. Portland is in a lot of top 10 lists for green, biking, all that stuff. So it’s a good story.

The other thing is the office market is very tight right now. The micro-factors – supply, demand, absorption – all those rates tell a very strong story about the opportunity for rent growth, appreciation and making good money on your investment.

DJC: You said the out-of-state demand for investment is hot right now. Why is that?

Hill: As we came out of the dot-com crash and the stock market problems in early 2000, institutions started putting more and more money into real estate as a more tangible asset. Even though their allocations aren’t huge relative to everything else they’ve invested in, I think a lot of the groups even doubled what they’re spending on real estate, so there’s that much more money being spent.

At the same time, the economy has caught momentum, so the investments made in real estate over the last five years for the most part have been very successful. They continue to perform well. More money wants to get in. It’s a cycle of ever-increasing demand for real estate.

DJC: For the development companies that have sold these large amounts of property, what does it mean for them? Are they pooling money to build elsewhere?

Hill: Everything is cyclical, so there are some people that say pricing is very good right now – let’s cash in and take advantage of that right now. For the most part, though, I think they’re going to reinvest it.

A group like Gerding Edlen, they’re developers. That’s what they do; that’s what they like to do. Now they’re going to have more money that they can put into new projects, create new opportunities. Because they’ve had a successful investment, there’s probably going to be even more people that want to work with them and groups like them to invest in real estate and make money themselves.

DJC: Are there any disadvantages selling something like the Brewery Blocks, which so define Portland, that to sell them to outside investors might reflect badly on the developer?

Hill: I think it’s a non-issue. People buy the real estate in order to make money. To be successful they need to keep the real estate looking nice. They need to attract tenants to the property, so they’re going to be very motivated to make a property like the Brewery Blocks even better.

They have so much invested, they really need it to perform. It’s possible that they’ll feel a little more pressure to maybe increase rents over time, but whether they want increases, the market ultimately decides what the rents should be.

I think it’s positive because there’s more money coming into this market and frees up money for Gerding Edlen to go out and do more projects. People on the street, in the businesses, would rarely have a sense of a change of ownership.

DJC: Did it come as a surprise at all to the commercial real estate community?

Hill: It was interesting when we heard they were going to sell it, a bit of a surprise. But it didn’t take long at all to say that makes sense. They’ve taken it from start to finish. The market for real estate and even this type of real estate is probably as hot as it can be. Sure it could be hotter, but it seems to be good timing. Ultimately developers want to have access to the equity in order to do another development.

DJC: What is the benefit to the out-of-state investor to buy the Brewery Blocks or KOIN Tower?

Hill: Well, it’s about getting returns for their investors. Much of the money is pension fund money. They can either put it in stocks or bonds or real estate. So, the benefit is that they think they’ve acquired an asset that will perform well in the long term.

DJC: So these aren’t short-term investments?

Hill: Not with the Brewery Blocks. It’s what you would consider a core property. It’s operating at a very high level. It’s more of a guaranteed investment. In the long run they may get a lower return, but there’s more certainty there. We have seen a lot of sales in this market recently, a lot of activity have been groups that would buy and hold for three to five years and sell them. The Brewery Blocks is not likely that kind of investment.

DJC: What’s the motivation to hold onto something for a shorter period of time?

Hill: Some groups are focused on what we call value-add opportunities, a higher yield. They’re just looking to purchase, have something on that property occur that will spike the price and then sell that. That way they can show a high return over a narrow period. If you buy because there’s vacancy, you get it leased and it’s worth a lot more. If you sell that right away you’re showing a high return on that money. If you then hold it for another five years, you even the return out over that time.

There are groups that are out there looking for that value-add opportunity with a higher return over a three- to five-year period. And then there are groups, like the one that bought the Brewery Blocks, they buy with a longer-term perspective.

DJC: What are examples of value-add investments here in Portland?

Hill: The U.S. Bancorp Tower that sold in 2004 for something like $165 million and sold in 2006 for ($286 million). They went in there, got the space leased, the market got hotter and they were able to sell it.

DJC: Is there ever a chance that Portland would become a first-tier

market?

Hill: Certainly. It’s not three to five years out. It could be 10 to 20 years. In fact, we’re in the process of selling the Port of Portland headquarters building. It would be a value-add kind of investment. There are a lot of people pursuing the investment, and one investor said to me, “We think Portland is great now, the trends are great.”

We also believe that it’s very possible that with all the start-up companies and organic growth, it’s not that far-fetched to think that something big could grow out of these companies and create the Googles, the big companies, that can develop out of the kind of activity going on in the market and all of a sudden have a couple of big corporate drivers. Portland at this point, growth is generally smaller, organic. It’s not big, corporate America. I think that’s going to limit it being a top-tier market. But something may develop out of here long-term.

DJC: So we’ve talked about Portland getting more into the national scope. Are we anywhere near being in a global investment market?

Hill: No. If you’re bringing money overseas, that’s a stretch to begin with. If you think about having money here in the U.S. and you have money to invest, you buy an office building in Paris or London.

That’s easy to justify. When you start naming second-tier cities in countries that people don’t know much about, it’s much harder. You’re typically doing it with other people’s money too.

DJC: Can you think of properties here in Portland that would be great candidates for outside investors?

Hill: Any piece of real estate has opportunities. The biggest challenge is getting willing sellers. If I knew some willing sellers, to answer your question, I’d be sitting down with them right now. There’s really nothing that stands out as an opportunity.
http://www.djcoregon.com/viewStory.cfm?recid=29877&userID=1

zilfondel
Aug 3, 2007, 3:58 PM
Shouldn't this have gone under the real estate or Brewery Blocks real estate thread?

sopdx
Aug 3, 2007, 5:15 PM
No, I don't believe so. This could have more impact on our city than anything else. It's all about money...for better or worse. I tend to think the latter.

Snowden352
Aug 3, 2007, 5:30 PM
Why?

sopdx
Aug 3, 2007, 7:51 PM
Why? Because I believe that what makes Portland stand out from other cities is that much of development here has been done by locals or people/firms that have a vested interest in the city and area.

The city has had and continues to have, strong planning both in land use and in transportation that has had a tremendous impact on our development. However, Portland has pretty much been off the radar. People here realize it's great and those who value sustainability and progressive politics, but the big league money boys - not so much. That has allowed the city to develop more slowly.

There are trade-offs, good and bad. I just feel that we are on the cusp of something very different and probably it is inevitable. People may get all jacked up about the fact that we are destined to become more important with more people and taller buildings. I just hope the end result isn't becoming like everywhere else, with very little soul left.

cab
Aug 3, 2007, 8:32 PM
Why invite the predator.

zilfondel
Aug 3, 2007, 10:50 PM
I agree with you, sopdx. Investment money coming into Portland will allow more stuff to be built... which is critical. Although affordability may suffer in the short-term, it is crucial that we build up the city, as these are the buildings that will define the city for the next 100+ years. I view them as sort of the 'other' infrastructure - ones that house people.

These out-of-state corporations that want to 'invest' money in our city - where these investments are relatively short term (max what, 30 years?) will last a LOT longer than that, as long as we don't tear them out for parking lots (unlikely).

Their investments in the short term will also help fuel our local developers' ability to get cool projects built. :)

MarkDaMan
Aug 31, 2007, 6:25 PM
Wave of national investors arrives in Portland arena
New players view local real estate market as safe, steady
Portland Business Journal - August 31, 2007
by Melody Finnemore
Special to the Business Journal

The last couple of years has seen some huge deals in Portland real estate -- led by sales of KOIN Center, U.S. Bancorp Tower and the Brewery Blocks, as well as the 46-property portfolio of local buildings formerly owned by Blackstone.

Those four deals in particular have something in common: They all brought new national investors to the Portland market, seemingly raising Portland's profile in the nation's commercial real estate marketplace.

Local brokers said large, national firms have long looked favorably upon Portland, but interest from such institutional investors has reached new highs during the last couple years.

"In the last 12 to 18 months, it has increased dramatically. You can easily look at the properties that have changed hands in the last year or year and a half and see that," said Buzz Ellis, a principal at Pacific Real Estate Partners.

"A lot of it has to do with the price per square foot and what it costs to own real estate in Portland," Ellis added. "A lot of these funds have been buying in larger cities like New York, Los Angeles or Seattle, and as those markets began to strengthen their price appreciation was fairly high. So, when those fund managers look in Portland, our price per square foot looks pretty good."

The wave of new owners includes Shorenstein Properties, which spent $1 billion buying Blackstone's 4 million-square-foot local portfolio, perhaps better known as the Equity Office Properties portfolio, since EOP assembled it over years.

KOIN Center landed in the lap of the California Public Employees' Retirement System, at a cost of $108 million. CalPERS itself isn't so new to the market -- it owns Bridgeport Village and has stakes in other Portland properties -- but its real estate representative, CommonWealth Partners LLC, is new here. Los Angeles-based CommonWealth chose KOIN as a CalPERS investment, negotiated the deal and is managing the property.

JPMorgan Asset Management arrived in the city last year, leading institutional investors that paid $280 million for a majority stake in the bank tower; JPMorgan and its institutional investors upped that expenditure this year, paying $292 million for the Brewery Blocks.

"One of the things we liked about Portland is that it tends not to get overbuilt and it's a stable, steady market that doesn't experience the same kind of ups and downs as a San Francisco or even a Seattle," said Andy Friedman, managing director of Shorenstein's Capital Transaction Group. "This was an opportunity to buy a portfolio with a diverse tenant roster in a market that has good supply constraint, a high quality of life, a talented work force and a low cost of living."

The San Francisco firm's purchase of the former EOP assets included downtown Portland's Congress Center and Umpqua Bank Plaza, as well as Kruse Way properties and three development parcels that could support an additional 550,000 square feet of office space. Shorenstein plans to break ground in September on a 15-story downtown building at Southwest First Avenue and Main Street, implementing EOP's original plans. Shorenstein will also build one or two new office buildings along Kruse Way.

Friedman said purchasing the Portland portfolio capped years of monitoring the Rose City as it evolved from a tertiary market into an increasingly profitable secondary sector.

Jennifer Medak, associate vice president for Norris Beggs & Simpson, said the number of Portland properties up for grabs adds to the attraction.

"There's been a lot of money spent as companies try to buy their way into the market, mostly because the closest markets -- Seattle and San Francisco -- don't have very many properties available. Portland is a good way to foray into the West Coast market," Medak said.

Innovative properties such as the Brewery Blocks, along with Portland's emphasis on sustainable development and livability, further enhance the city's marketability, according to Lana Baldock, a senior director of Cushman & Wakefield's office brokerage team.

"Portland really has the right dynamic," Baldock said. "It's a national model for transportation, we have the urban growth boundary, we have a strong work force, and we have affordable housing. All of those quality-of-life things have put Portland on the map."

Medak agreed, noting it may be several years before property owners begin to reap the economic rewards of green building, but the movement already is a key selling point.

The growing presence of national institutional investors in Portland means it has become more difficult for local players to compete in the market, not only in terms of investment opportunities but also the chance to manage those properties.

"If you have national companies buying properties, they have relationships with the national management companies so it makes sense for them to hire those companies to manage their Portland properties as well," Baldock said.

Shorenstein Properties plans to take a different approach, according to Gregg Meyer, senior vice president of asset management. The management team for its Portland portfolio includes former Equity Office Properties staffers, who are located near the properties they supervise.

"That gives us an opportunity to be close to the tenants we rely upon to fill our office space and create a more robust management style," Meyer said.

As more national institutional investors buy Portland-area properties, most agreed, rental rates are likely to rise. Tom Fellman, first vice president at CB Richard Ellis, said the increases are likely but still will not mirror national levels.

"The negative for investors is that we don't have the huge increases in rent and our growth is slower. On the other hand, we don't have the busts they see in San Francisco or Seattle," Fellman said.

"Everybody nationally likes to look at this market because it's a very steady, stable market. The appreciation may not be what it has been the last 10 or 12 years, but it's still a very safe market. That's the tradeoff."

portland@bizjournals.com | 503-274-8733
http://portland.bizjournals.com/portland/stories/2007/09/03/focus4.html?t=printable

zilfondel
Sep 1, 2007, 8:16 PM
"Everybody nationally likes to look at this market because it's a very steady, stable market. The appreciation may not be what it has been the last 10 or 12 years, but it's still a very safe market. That's the tradeoff."

So... we're different than every other city (market)? Interesting. So much for the booms, but are we going to be locked into a steady rate of development like we are in right now - for the next 20 years??? (as our population increases)

slow and steady wins the race