PDA

View Full Version : Boddy: "Is Vancouver building a design gap?"


Holden West
May 5, 2007, 2:51 AM
DWELLING: KUDOS: BRITISH COLUMBIA'S 2007 LIEUTENANT-GOVERNOR'S AWARDS FOR ARCHITECTURE

Is Vancouver building a design gap?

Condos, condos going up everywhere, but apparently none are worthy of a medal


TREVOR BODDY

Last year, more than half of all buildings constructed by British Columbia architects were multi-family housing - townhouses, apartments, and condos, condos, condos of all shapes and sizes. Yet when it came to the short list for this year's B.C. Lieutenant-Governor's awards in architecture, only three of 37 finalists were multi-family housing, and none won medals or even merit mentions. What gives?

Granted, multi-family housing is the Rodney Dangerfield of architecture - it don't get no respect. It is quite surprising to some non-architects to learn that many students of architecture graduate never having designed a single duplex, apartment block or condo tower. In all the years I taught at Carleton University's school of architecture, my colleagues never once deigned to set a design studio task on the topic of multi-family housing. A "dwelling for a poet in a cave," yes; a "hut for a philosopher on a pole," yes. But never a project that looked at housing as a public good and as the binding texture of our cities.

Similarly, the trend-setting glossy architecture magazines that get ritually passed around design studios almost never feature standard residential housing - art galleries, interpretive centres, and mansions for millionaires by the dozen, but rarely multi-family housing. Both of the key American magazines, Architecture and Architectural Record, put the topic of social housing on their covers in the same month in the early 1990s - and ignored it for the decade to follow.

But the real reason multiple-family housing rarely makes it onto design awards lists is that architects are not paid enough to do it well. The fact is that here in B.C. we devote around 4 per cent of total housing costs to all design fees (architecture, engineering, landscape), while we pay four times that amount for real estate marketing (advertising, display centres, agent's fees). Well, you get what you pay for.


The only individual house on the 2007 BC Lieutenant-Governor's awards list is the radical renovation of a West Vancouver single family house by Peter Cardew, singled out for one of LG's "special jury awards."

The home is a silent protest against the practice of "knock-downs" in Vancouver and West Vancouver's toniest neighbourhoods. As Mr. Cardew puts it in his design statement: "If judged by contemporary standards, the architecture of the recent past is often rejected as being of little worth when compared to that which is very old or very new."

In part because of environmental concerns about this throwaway attitude to older or under-sized dwellings on lots in our most expensive neighbourhoods, the architect and client Jean Claude LeBlanc decided to keep key portions of an all-too banal 1970s split-level bungalow as they brought its look and appointments into the new century.

To begin with, they cut out the schmaltz -- the dormers, the multi-paned fake archaic picture window, the harvest gold exterior paint job. Into the shell of the house they cut strategic insertions -- new stairs in birch or concrete, removal of walls to make a continuous living-kitchen-dining room, some handsome metallic railings.

The LeBlanc renovation's most obvious change is a skiff of concrete that now covers the entire main floor, and extends out to rear garden. Contrasting beautifully with the warm tones of the new millwork, this brings an urban loft sensibility to the land of tweed and Land Rovers. Taking a note from the Oak Park houses of Frank Lloyd Wright, Cardew's design projects the renewed house's spatial patterning and palette of materials out into the garden, LeBlanc's most splendid and comfortable zone of all.

Even with its new dark brown paint job, and much-widened front door, the street-side exteriors are subtle enough to fool many that the house is unchanged. "This Split-Level not only retains architectural evidence of the most significant residential building boom in Canadian history," says Mr. Cardew, but "it also shows that [existing] building stock can be adapted to satisfy the requirements of modern living." Neither I nor the L-G design jury could say it better.

The top six awards

Winnipeg Library Addition:
Patkau Architects of Vancouver won the Lieutenant-Governor's Medal for its addition to the Winnipeg Library. A tight budget and an architecturally bumptious existing library energized rather than handicapped this work by Canada's most internationally famous designers. It's time for a major B.C. building from them.

Desert Cultural Centre:
Constructed for the Nk'Mip First Nation in Osoyoos, this interpretive centre also received a medal.
The area in and around reserve lands is the northernmost extension of the great Sonoran Desert, which starts in Mexico, and is the only such landscape in Canada. The structure designed by Bruce Haden of Hotson Bakker Haden Boniface takes the idea of sedimentation and the sandy textures of deserts literally, by making a compacted earth wall its spectacular central set piece. The space-making around this earthy eye candy (call it terra-toffee) is subtle, the other details deferring to this one big move shaping plan and elevations.

Aberdeen Centre:
Bing Thom Architects of Vancouver was awarded a Certificate of Merit for the Aberdeen Centre. Amoeboid in shape, and checker-boarded with multi-coloured glass in transparent, translucent and opaque variations, the building overturns suburban shopping centre clichés.
Killarney Community Pool:
Hughes Condon Marler Architects of Vancouver won a Certificate of Merit for this, the latest in a string of fine pools from the firm. Light-filled and user-friendly, it is a welcome public spa for all in Eastside Vancouver.

LeBlanc House:
Peter Cardew Architects of Vancouver was given a Special Jury Award for its innovative renovation (see sidebar).

Mole Hill:
Hotson Bakker Boniface Haden of Vancouver was give a Special Jury Award for this housing project, a $1-million-per-house conservation of the West End's last intact block of Edwardian residences, including laneway improvements.
tboddy@globeandmail.com

Coldrsx
May 5, 2007, 4:40 AM
vancouver condos are bland (many of them) but they are years ahead of anything east until you hit paris.

fever
May 5, 2007, 5:06 AM
I think the outward appearance of condos has improve quite a bit recently.

The problem with architecture awards (imo) is that they're more like modernist awards. They go to the building that breaks with convention most, while ignoring functional design and aesthetics. Single family residences are more likely to win because only the person who buys the place needs to agree with the architect's ideas. That person is often the architect.

Condos are designed almost by convention. They retain traditional elements to appeal to as many consumers as possible. They aren't designed as discrete units, separated from the city behind a plaza or a wall. They are forced to obey basic urban design principles.

Public buildings often give the architect more freedom. They are typically placed in a park on their own, giving them special status. And nobody has to live in them.

Wooster
May 5, 2007, 6:45 AM
I think the outward appearance of condos has improve quite a bit recently.

The problem with architecture awards (imo) is that they're more like modernist awards. They go to the building that breaks with convention most, while ignoring functional design and aesthetics. Single family residences are more likely to win because only the person who buys the place needs to agree with the architect's ideas. That person is often the architect.

Condos are designed almost by convention. They retain traditional elements to appeal to as many consumers as possible. They aren't designed as discrete units, separated from the city behind a plaza or a wall. They are forced to obey basic urban design principles.

Public buildings often give the architect more freedom. They are typically placed in a park on their own, giving them special status. And nobody has to live in them.

Yep, I think you've hit the nail right on the head.

slide_rule
May 5, 2007, 8:08 AM
i'd be happier if more people paid attention to mundane considerations like building practicality and access to efficient public transit. many peoples' judgment regarding building aesthetics have more to do with fashion than any real or perceived architectural merit.

the awards are nice, but are often given to expensive and trendy buildings. not everyone can be a star. but a decent, well-designed apartment shouldn't be disparaged either.

the street-level townhouses of the current vancouver condos aren't particularly user friendly. i realize frontage is at a premium, and people want street-level access. but a <1000 sq. ft. 3-storey townhouse on 15' wide frontages lead to a large percentage of space devoted to staircases and is not friendly towards the mobility impaired.

TwoFace
May 5, 2007, 3:16 PM
I don’t know about that, Vancouver has a very rich and progressive architectural style. But you have to look to the affluent neighbourhoods to appreciate our skyscrapers.
Obviously style and innovation of the building is based on it’s market value, hence you get the “highest and best use” box type building in the suburbs where they can be build affordably and the residences will be “price driven”, where as architectural innovation costs money and has to translate through it’s retail marketability.

Take a look at some world-class architecture just in Coal Harbour for a start:
Callisto & Carina
Shaw Tower
1 & 2 Harbour Green
Harbourside
The Bayshore building (one with the stepped patios)

These Skyscrapers rival any city’s best if not surpass it. It seems that as the “metamorphoses” of Vancouver’s downtown marches on, the planning department is more diligent in its requirement for innovation and style, this is a good thing.

Holden West
May 5, 2007, 5:06 PM
I thought that surely Callisto and Carina must have won some sort of award, so I looked it up (http://www.ibi-hb.com/p_carina.htm):

Carina and Callisto received a 2005 Award of Excellence from the Urban Development Institute - Pacific Region for best high-rise multi-family building.

To which I'm certain Boddy would reply "Sure, but what have you done for me lately..."

ssiguy
May 5, 2007, 5:18 PM
Vancouver probably has the most uniform type of condos in NA. Almost everything is 30 stories and made out of blue or green glass.
All the buildings in Vancouver built in the last 15 years are nearly all glass and steel. It gives the city a very sterile look. This why when skylines are ranked Vancouver never gets a decent review.

TwoFace
May 5, 2007, 7:31 PM
Vancouver probably has the most uniform type of condos in NA. Almost everything is 30 stories and made out of blue or green glass.
All the buildings in Vancouver built in the last 15 years are nearly all glass and steel. It gives the city a very sterile look. This why when skylines are ranked Vancouver never gets a decent review.

Maybe so, but in order to have longevity, there needs to be some sort of uniformity.
Dubai, which is also going through a building boom, is described by most architects as the new "Disneyland". Their government and companies bring in different architects from around the world to design and build this new and modern city, and this has resulted in a design competitions between the companies, creating a mixed bag of styles and designs that create friction between each other.
This link shows an example of "architecture gone amok"
http://www.aidan.co.uk/photos16-Modern%20Architecture.php

Here is an older story from gulfnews.com, thing just got worst since then...

'Terrible' buildings fail to inspire top designers
By Daniel Bardsley, Staff Reporter


One of Britain's most renowned architects has labelled the new buildings springing up in Dubai as "terrible".

Speaking to a British architecture journal, Sir Michael Hopkins said the city was uninspiring architecturally and a difficult place in which to produce good design.


Local specialists, however, said the criticisms are unfair, pointing at quality buildings such as the Burj Al Arab and Madinat Jumeirah. Dubai is not unique, they said, in having its share of poorly designed buildings.

Sir Michael made his comments to UK newspaper Building Design, which also reported criticisms of Dubai's architecture by George Ferguson, president of the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA).

Sir Michael came face to face with local architecture after designing 60 villas in the Emirates Hills in Dubai. He is also reportedly designing a 65-storey offshore building here. "In Dubai, it is really hard because not only have you got this terrible stuff going up around you, but it is very hot and there is very little to deal with architecturally," he said.

"If you haven't got a building next door that needs to be preserved, there is not that starting point. It is very hard. You have to start with the sun in the desert as a reference point."

RIBA president Ferguson was similarly downbeat about Dubai's architecture. "Hopkins is absolutely right. Dubai is a model of unsustainability. It is exciting for all the wrong reasons. Dubai is like a great theme park," he said.

Dubai's economic boom has made it one of the busiest construction hubs in the world. Among the projects planned is Burj Dubai, likely to be the world's tallest building, the International City residential complex and the Business Bay scheme.

Christopher Ellingham, managing director of Dubai-based design firm DRU Gulf, said it was unfair to say the standard of local architecture was poor.

"These people should look at what's being created in their own backyard because there's as much bad architecture in the United Kingdom as there is here," he said. "There are some pretty awful buildings going up along Shaikh Zayed Road, but there are also some extremely nice ones there," he said.

He said some of the new buildings were "iconic", singling out the Burj Al Arab, which he described as "a world beater".

Robert Punchard, a director of John R. Harris and Partners in Dubai, agreed. "I understand [that] things could be better, but there is good and bad everywhere," he said.

mezzanine
May 5, 2007, 7:47 PM
Not to highjack the thread, but am I the only one that thinks that Robson Square/Law courts are a loss of potential? Some parts of erickson's design are wonderful (the glass celing and space frame, although old hat now, were revolutional and still look timeless) the actual square itself is sterile and devoid of life. The rink no longer can sustain ice and the landscaped areas are good hiding places for the homeless (i.e. the mound at hornby and robson).

I'm glad that Thom's aberdeen centre won an award. :cheers:

fever
May 5, 2007, 8:31 PM
Does the Urban Development Institute award for urban design or architecture? Is it granted by planners or architects?

I think most here would agree with your assessment of Robson Square, mezzanine. It could be much better near Robson.

EastVanMark
May 6, 2007, 4:11 AM
Dubai might have its problems with too many iconic or exorbitant designs, but at the other side of the spectrum, Vancouver has far too many buildings of the same scale and basic design which makes the skyline rather plain and uninteresting.

SpongeG
May 6, 2007, 7:50 PM
Vancouver probably has the most uniform type of condos in NA. Almost everything is 30 stories and made out of blue or green glass.
All the buildings in Vancouver built in the last 15 years are nearly all glass and steel. It gives the city a very sterile look. This why when skylines are ranked Vancouver never gets a decent review.

to be fair to vancouver - most of what we see as uniform and the same is just that because most of it is the same handful of developers and its all built in the same time period when what is being built is trendy or the style of the time

you can see similiar when you look at the west end and all the buildings that went up in the same time period are easy to pick out - you can walk around and see which buildings were built around the same time

like the whole concord pacific lands the company itself is going to want to acheive a signature look as well - so people can say oh thats a concord development - its branding

SpongeG
May 6, 2007, 7:52 PM
Not to highjack the thread, but am I the only one that thinks that Robson Square/Law courts are a loss of potential? Some parts of erickson's design are wonderful (the glass celing and space frame, although old hat now, were revolutional and still look timeless) the actual square itself is sterile and devoid of life. The rink no longer can sustain ice and the landscaped areas are good hiding places for the homeless (i.e. the mound at hornby and robson).

I'm glad that Thom's aberdeen centre won an award. :cheers:

yeah they should get rid of that mound and open it up and create a bigger square

the rest is really well used though - in the summer they often have events down under there - i have seen bands, dancers etc. and people hanging out on the stairs