PDA

View Full Version : NEW YORK | One World Trade Center | 1,776' Pinnacle / 1,373' Roof | 108 FLOORS


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 [237] 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361

nydavid
May 21, 2012, 11:14 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v215/spookykid520/photo24.jpg

drawing found on an ad on 42nd st :)

marshall
May 21, 2012, 11:25 PM
Any idea when we might see the next jump which will take us over the 400 meter mark? Getting so close!

NYguy
May 21, 2012, 11:59 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/22/nyregion/in-crane-far-above-manhattan-no-false-moves-allowed.html

Operating a Crane at 1,100 Feet, No False Moves Are Allowed

By CHARLES V. BAGLI
May 21, 2012



To get to his workplace in the sky, Tom Gordon must board two construction hoists to the 86th floor, riding in open-air steel cages that traverse the side of the tower of 1 World Trade Center. There are no walls yet at this height. A narrow catwalk extends about 30 feet from the lip of the building to the cockpit of his climbing tower crane, a Favco 1500 with a 500-horsepower diesel engine and a 135-foot boom.

Mr. Gordon is among an elite cadre who operate the roughly 200 cranes that swing across the Manhattan skyline in full public view, but few do their work at the height or the scrutiny that accompanies his work. He cannot swivel the crane in one direction too quickly because it would send his load in a much wider arc that could threaten the crane’s stability. If the wind exceeds 30 miles per hour, Mr. Gordon shuts down the crane. A dropped load, or even a flyaway hard hat, could kill someone below, worker or pedestrian. “You’re always trying to control the load, make sure it’s being moved around safely,” Mr. Gordon, 45, said. “New York City’s a little different than anywhere else. As you can see, it’s congested. You’ve got buildings everywhere. Cars everywhere.”

Over the objections of Mr. Gordon’s union, Local 14 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, the Bloomberg administration has adopted new rules for licensing crane operators, requiring national certification and new training requirements. The union insists that the city should continue to administer the practical and written tests for a license and not de-emphasize the importance and necessity of having local experience.

The union contends that the thicket of tall buildings is more dense in New York than elsewhere. There are about 535 buildings in the city that are 328 feet tall or higher, according to the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, compared with 257 in Chicago and 57 in Los Angeles. “It’s not like running a crane in the middle of the field,” Mr. Gordon said. “The guys who operate cranes in New York are the best anywhere. It’s the environment you’re forced to work in.”

About 220 feet above him, there are two tower cranes at the top of 1 World Trade Center that reel up the steel beams for the iron workers and the ever-rising tower. Sitting 1,100 feet above the street and 30 feet off the side of what will be New York’s tallest skyscraper, Mr. Gordon guided his crane’s boom closer to the platform jutting off the 86th floor. There, four concrete workers, each wearing a harness so they will not be swept into space and almost certain death, grabbed the cable extending from the boom. They lashed it around three tons of iron rods that had been used to hold the concrete forms for the central core of the tower. One of the workers raised his gloved hand in a signal that Mr. Gordon could haul away the load. His left hand on a toggle stick, Mr. Gordon slowly swiveled the boom and his cockpit, or cab, away from the building as the load began its descent to a spot on the street below that is barely visible.





Tyrannosaurus_Rex (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tyrannosaurus_rex/7242275716/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7236/7242275716_0f2b38cd31_b.jpg



MannyB Yo! (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mannyfest/7244717136/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5235/7244717136_fceb0318af_b.jpg



CasualCapture (http://www.flickr.com/photos/casualcapture/7242685086/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8008/7242685086_4de69a7998_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8164/7242413520_0db8bd2c90_b.jpg

m0by
May 22, 2012, 6:28 AM
Any idea when we might see the next jump which will take us over the 400 meter mark? Getting so close!

Atm they need two weeks per floor... guess we will see new steel next week, maybe on monday?!
Correct me if I am wrong...

Do we have new information about the base?

NYguy
May 22, 2012, 11:32 AM
skinnylawyer (http://www.flickr.com/photos/skinnylawyer/7247392976/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7101/7247392976_719644c1ac_b.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7101/7247392976_eaa0d24213_h.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7237/7247393192_1b34e07026_h.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7223/7231534458_2466afb689_h.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7076/7247504278_e718ff6e64_b.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7076/7247504278_03de044d24_h.jpg



67 Cadi (http://www.flickr.com/photos/63056133@N04/7245669464/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7236/7245669464_e2c29e56b3_b.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7236/7245669464_7427405f29_h.jpg



RichardSchneider (http://www.flickr.com/photos/richardleeschneider/7246705116/sizes/h/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8153/7246705116_319b602817_h.jpg

2-TOWERS
May 22, 2012, 2:12 PM
What a shot !!!!!!!!!!!!:tup:

Stained
May 22, 2012, 4:44 PM
That was a great series of shots. Downtown is beginning to dominate the area once more.

crewex
May 22, 2012, 5:20 PM
Loving this tower more every day, can't wait till their's two again!

CarlosV
May 22, 2012, 5:29 PM
After two days of blinding fog, you can see a new row of glass :)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8165/7250255958_db50c2d931_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7250255958/)
WTC Towering Heights (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7250255958/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

sask1982
May 22, 2012, 5:30 PM
I am coming to NYC for the first time in fall 2013. 1 WTC will still not be completed then, correct?

We are planning a 10-14 day stay. I hope that will be enough time to see all the sights!

Tru Bert
May 22, 2012, 5:40 PM
I am coming to NYC for the first time in fall 2013. 1 WTC will still not be completed then, correct?

We are planning a 10-14 day stay. I hope that will be enough time to see all the sights!

By the fall of 2013, One Wtc will be complete and open according to its plans. But remember plans can always change, as to what we have seen as this tower has been built.

nickguar
May 22, 2012, 5:41 PM
That was a great series of shots. Downtown is beginning to dominate the area once more.

Nothing beats Midtown, when you're in the canyon, a forest of steel sequoias.

hunser
May 22, 2012, 6:03 PM
A week old but still worth it...

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7226/7248214632_094411a787_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/yukonblizzard/7248214632/)
New York City on May 15, 2012 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/yukonblizzard/7248214632/) von mudpig (http://www.flickr.com/people/yukonblizzard/) auf Flickr


http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7100/7210421738_be2f81ec81_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/yukonblizzard/7210421738/)
New York City on May 15, 2012 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/yukonblizzard/7210421738/) von mudpig (http://www.flickr.com/people/yukonblizzard/) auf Flickr


http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7216/7201344638_d63979a417_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/yukonblizzard/7201344638/)
Pre-Dawn & New York City on May 13, 2012 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/yukonblizzard/7201344638/) von mudpig (http://www.flickr.com/people/yukonblizzard/) auf Flickr

NewYorkDominates
May 22, 2012, 6:46 PM
Nothing beats Midtown, when you're in the canyon, a forest of steel sequoias.

I haven't been to Midtown or New York for that matter,but I've seen a couple pics of 6th Ave. and it looks amazing.

Yes,new glass.I think we're at the 72nd floor now.

sterlippo1
May 22, 2012, 6:57 PM
Nothing beats Midtown, when you're in the canyon, a forest of steel sequoias.

it is awesome but i prefer Downtown myself. I just like the chaotic way the streets are laid out as well as the canyons

JZeig1
May 22, 2012, 7:12 PM
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7236/7245669464_7427405f29_h.jpg




If you look at the photo on the reflection of the 4wtc, there is a building behind the shorter of the three WFC building. Can someone tell me what buildings that is???

Oohh,,, beautiful pic's...

chris123678
May 22, 2012, 7:33 PM
Can Someone PLEASE answer this.

Why is there a platform right below the 20th floor of the base?

Also, why is the crane there? Are they getting ready to remove the netting for base glass? Rumors are at skyscrapercity.

Roadcruiser1
May 22, 2012, 7:41 PM
If you look at the photo on the reflection of the 4wtc, there is a building behind the shorter of the three WFC building. Can someone tell me what buildings that is???

Oohh,,, beautiful pic's...

That is either 255 Liberty Street, or the Manhattan Sailing School.

Can Someone PLEASE answer this.

Why is there a platform right below the 20th floor of the base?

Also, why is the crane there? Are they getting ready to remove the netting for base glass? Rumors are at skyscrapercity.

Preparing for base glass. I don't know about the crane, but they probably won't remove the net. They will work behind it.

Noll
May 22, 2012, 9:08 PM
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7213/7250963984_7b87b1c386_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryanbudhu/7250963984/)
One World Trade Center May 2012 Progress Shot (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryanbudhu/7250963984/) by RBudhu (http://www.flickr.com/people/ryanbudhu/), on Flickr

JACKinBeantown
May 22, 2012, 10:26 PM
A week old but still worth it...

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7226/7248214632_094411a787_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/yukonblizzard/7248214632/)
New York City on May 15, 2012 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/yukonblizzard/7248214632/) von mudpig (http://www.flickr.com/people/yukonblizzard/) auf Flickr




That's a friggin' fantastic picture!

QUEENSNYMAN
May 22, 2012, 10:32 PM
That's a friggin' fantastic picture!

Yes truly a beautiful shot thats for sure:)

http://www.youtube.com/user/NYBOY75

Domamania
May 22, 2012, 10:59 PM
can someone please post a link to the wtc cam thats on top of tower 7.. Thank you so much..

sterlippo1
May 22, 2012, 11:20 PM
That's a friggin' fantastic picture!

I like how the lights on top of Setai look

eseninobrandon
May 23, 2012, 12:08 AM
ive never seen a building top out. one world trade center will be my first. :megusta:

NYguy
May 23, 2012, 12:46 AM
jag9889 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jag9889/7248990898/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7073/7248990898_2b6c9981f9_b.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7103/7248992830_887773e5d9_b.jpg



Blaufish (http://www.flickr.com/photos/blaufish/7247245710/sizes/h/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7239/7247245710_02033324be_b.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7239/7247245710_cd8702bbff_h.jpg



laverrue (http://www.flickr.com/photos/23912576@N05/7252620536/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7216/7252620536_9f340020e2_b.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7216/7252620536_a968abaa9d_h.jpg

hunser
May 23, 2012, 10:50 AM
Higher resolution...


http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7226/7248214632_05434c21e9_k.jpg

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7100/7210421738_4c3dc143e6_k.jpg

mudpig (http://www.flickr.com/photos/yukonblizzard/)

:cheers:

hunser
May 23, 2012, 10:54 AM
And a recent one...

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7213/7250963984_7b87b1c386_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryanbudhu/7250963984/)
One World Trade Center May 2012 Progress Shot (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryanbudhu/7250963984/) von RBudhu (http://www.flickr.com/people/ryanbudhu/) auf Flickr

HomrQT
May 23, 2012, 11:11 AM
Hunser... you are a god amongst men, sir. Thank you for sharing in a higher res. Absolutely amazing photos.

car2004
May 23, 2012, 1:22 PM
Higher resolution...


http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7226/7248214632_05434c21e9_k.jpg

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7100/7210421738_4c3dc143e6_k.jpg

mudpig (http://www.flickr.com/photos/yukonblizzard/)

:cheers:

Wow, man! These are thus are the best pictures I have seen of NYC at night!!! By far! May I ask, what type of camera do you use? Truly great work!

hunser
May 23, 2012, 2:44 PM
Wow, man! These are thus are the best pictures I have seen of NYC at night!!! By far! May I ask, what type of camera do you use? Truly great work!

Hunser... you are a god amongst men, sir. Thank you for sharing in a higher res. Absolutely amazing photos.

My pleasure. But those pics aren't mine, that's why I linked them: mudpig (http://www.flickr.com/photos/yukonblizzard/).

NYC's skyline sure is amazing! :yes:

pnapp1
May 23, 2012, 2:48 PM
Here is a pic I took of the base on the South side of 1 WTC. All the brackets are in and they are re-priming and painting the steel but no curtain wall yet.

http://www.wtcphotos.com/photos/wtc1_2012-05-10_p1.jpg

babybackribs2314
May 23, 2012, 5:10 PM
From last night & full update--

http://www.yimbynews.com/2012/05/construction-update-world-trade-center.html

I still think this looks ghoulish, but 4 WTC moreso (at night)... when finished, the lighting should look phenomenal. I really hope they do something with the edges.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-wWXWzigkWjA/T70ZjEbojxI/AAAAAAAABWU/mS30Lrd2Qbw/s640/2012-05-22+22.40.29.jpg

chris123678
May 23, 2012, 6:46 PM
PLEASE- Is the glass on the 73rd floor or the 81st floor? Another user on skyscraper city said its on floor 81, but i don't think so.

Zapatan
May 23, 2012, 6:55 PM
it's on the 73rd...

StrongIsland
May 23, 2012, 7:32 PM
it's on the 73rd...

I believe they are at 75 now.

pnapp1
May 23, 2012, 7:35 PM
I believe they are at 75 now.

75 is correct.

pnapp1
May 23, 2012, 7:36 PM
look at what we have going on here:

http://www.wtcphotos.com/photos/wtc1_2012-05-23_p1.jpg

mat97
May 23, 2012, 7:54 PM
75 is correct.

The glass in the south side is at 75th, in the north side is at 76th

NewYorkDominates
May 23, 2012, 8:27 PM
Installation of panels.Nice.:)

sterlippo1
May 23, 2012, 10:14 PM
[QUOTE=NYguy;5709608]


http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7216/7252620536_9f340020e2_b.jpg

i got dizzy looking at this, it's excellent

marshall
May 23, 2012, 10:52 PM
Wonderful pictures! Keep them coming, guys! :cool:

Davidsam52
May 23, 2012, 11:30 PM
look at what we have going on here:

http://www.wtcphotos.com/photos/wtc1_2012-05-23_p1.jpg

looks like they're getting ready do do something with the podium facade.....:cheers::cheers:

chris123678
May 23, 2012, 11:55 PM
What's going on with the base?

599GTO
May 24, 2012, 1:22 AM
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/05/24/article-2149016-1340EF4B000005DC-789_964x791.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/05/23/article-2149016-1340D582000005DC-900_964x1351.jpg

Roadcruiser1
May 24, 2012, 2:02 AM
What's going on with the base?

Preparations for base cladding.

Thunderpriest
May 24, 2012, 2:10 AM
I have been a long time reader of this thread, following the construction of 1 WTC since its beginning. Until now, I have been content to read everyone's input and have enjoyed the pictures and posts. However, with the recent alterations to the spire, I felt like I had an opinion to share.

1st. The spire should still remain classified as a spire and not an antenna, as it is anchored to the building using cable stays. I had read that the cables were one of the primary reasons for the classification as a spire. If the cladding is removed, but the underlying structure is still anchored by the cables, it should still count towards the final building height, if I understand correctly.

2nd. It is shameful that the Durst Company is making the decision to remove the cladding this late in the game. This is an integral design feature and the bare spire, even with LED lighting, is far less attractive. The least that they can do is to paint the spire white, but the renderings don't give that impression.

3rd. If there is no possibility of using the fiberglass radome, there is a rather simple solution to covering the antenna. White tensile fabric. Look at the roof of the Denver Airport as an example. A sheath of fabric could be made, in 8-12 separate sheets that could be raised like sails using the same type of kevlar cables used to stay the mast. This would require virtually no modification of the spire. A pulley system would have to be added to the top of the spire to allow for the hoisting of the sheath panels. The periodically spaced rings on the mast for affixing the radome would help to give the fabric a similar profile to the radome enclosure. Maintenance is then quite simple.....just lower any "sail" that requires repair or replacement....nobody would even have to climb the spire. As an added bonus....the LED lights could illuminate the fabric from within, and I believe it would actually look better than the radome. This couldn't be an overly expensive compromise, and it would look nearly identical to the radome clad spire from a distance.

I just had to throw my two cents out there.....as I can't believe that an idea this simple hasn't been thought of.

chris123678
May 24, 2012, 2:48 AM
Preparations for base cladding.


So when will that take place? Within the next week maybe?

NewYorkDominates
May 24, 2012, 4:56 AM
So when will that take place? Within the next week maybe?

Late 2012

NYguy
May 24, 2012, 2:36 PM
United States Marine Corps Official Page (http://www.flickr.com/photos/marine_corps/7261483096/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8011/7261483096_8384ef572b_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8011/7261483096_065e819e09_h.jpg



multimediaimpre (http://www.flickr.com/photos/79137904@N07/7259092894/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7226/7259092894_18d32fc684_b.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7226/7259092894_8b1f5d0a43_h.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8024/7259089514_761c01e070_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8024/7259089514_223c2b7e6d_h.jpg



ktorster (http://www.flickr.com/photos/kurt_torster/7258877532/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8006/7258877532_10a47d0dbf_b.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8006/7258877532_485768d332_h.jpg



Tom Turner - SeaTeamImages / AirTeamImages (http://www.flickr.com/photos/11606523@N06/7254340876/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7224/7254340876_013954472b_b.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7073/7257284800_ae9ba38bb9_b.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7236/7257306482_a70701fb91_b.jpg

O-tacular
May 24, 2012, 3:10 PM
I have been a long time reader of this thread, following the construction of 1 WTC since its beginning. Until now, I have been content to read everyone's input and have enjoyed the pictures and posts. However, with the recent alterations to the spire, I felt like I had an opinion to share.

1st. The spire should still remain classified as a spire and not an antenna, as it is anchored to the building using cable stays. I had read that the cables were one of the primary reasons for the classification as a spire. If the cladding is removed, but the underlying structure is still anchored by the cables, it should still count towards the final building height, if I understand correctly.

2nd. It is shameful that the Durst Company is making the decision to remove the cladding this late in the game. This is an integral design feature and the bare spire, even with LED lighting, is far less attractive. The least that they can do is to paint the spire white, but the renderings don't give that impression.

3rd. If there is no possibility of using the fiberglass radome, there is a rather simple solution to covering the antenna. White tensile fabric. Look at the roof of the Denver Airport as an example. A sheath of fabric could be made, in 8-12 separate sheets that could be raised like sails using the same type of kevlar cables used to stay the mast. This would require virtually no modification of the spire. A pulley system would have to be added to the top of the spire to allow for the hoisting of the sheath panels. The periodically spaced rings on the mast for affixing the radome would help to give the fabric a similar profile to the radome enclosure. Maintenance is then quite simple.....just lower any "sail" that requires repair or replacement....nobody would even have to climb the spire. As an added bonus....the LED lights could illuminate the fabric from within, and I believe it would actually look better than the radome. This couldn't be an overly expensive compromise, and it would look nearly identical to the radome clad spire from a distance.

I just had to throw my two cents out there.....as I can't believe that an idea this simple hasn't been thought of.

Good suggestion. It doesn't sound like Durst-bag is even entertaining other options though. From what I can gather he's just a stubborn cheap ass who won't compromise and just wants to do as bare minimum as possible. If he won't even paint it, do you think he'd add something as "fancy" as cloth?

Edit: I'm beginning to think his idea of high maintenance for the spire is anything not involving leaving it as a rusting pigeon roost.

RockMont
May 24, 2012, 6:33 PM
What is the rate of speed, the glass facade is going up now?

NYC=WTC
May 24, 2012, 7:36 PM
What is the rate of speed, the glass facade is going up now?

Looks like one full floor or one half floor per day. Seems like glass installation is a relatively simple process once they finish the floors :haha::haha::haha:

chris123678
May 24, 2012, 8:09 PM
Why Do We Have To Wait Until Late Year if the base is ready for glass now?
I'd give my own assumption and say it wills start early June.

Thunderpriest
May 24, 2012, 10:09 PM
Good suggestion. It doesn't sound like Durst-bag is even entertaining other options though. From what I can gather he's just a stubborn cheap ass who won't compromise and just wants to do as bare minimum as possible. If he won't even paint it, do you think he'd add something as "fancy" as cloth?

Edit: I'm beginning to think his idea of high maintenance for the spire is anything not involving leaving it as a rusting pigeon roost.

Now that you mention it, that's precisely what the rings look like....perches.
I was hoping that the thing will painted at least, and that the renderings attempted to take the setting sun into consideration when the coloring for the spire was added. The entire building has an orange cast to it. If for no other reason than weatherproofing, the spire must be painted.

I still really think that the tensile fabric is the best compromise.
It just doesn't seem as though Durst would even consider any compromise.
:shrug:

CarlosV
May 24, 2012, 10:12 PM
cloudy, foggy for the last 2 days.....kinda eerie looking..

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7104/7264292118_f3c1d91bc3.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7264292118/)
DSC_0023 copy (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7264292118/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

aquablue
May 24, 2012, 10:37 PM
Good suggestion. It doesn't sound like Durst-bag is even entertaining other options though. From what I can gather he's just a stubborn cheap ass who won't compromise and just wants to do as bare minimum as possible. If he won't even paint it, do you think he'd add something as "fancy" as cloth?

Edit: I'm beginning to think his idea of high maintenance for the spire is anything not involving leaving it as a rusting pigeon roost.

If the spire is left like that, I'll eat my hat! I have more faith in NYC, as a global world city, than many seem to have. There is no way that the future signature pinnacle of NYC and reminder to 9/11 will be crowned with an ugly spike that would be viewed as a major eye-sore anywhere else in the city. Shame on NYC's leaders as a whole if they let this man bring his miserly little plan to fruition without even a whimper. Again, I'll be shocked if this occurs. It is just not a plausible thing to do when you are dealing with such a site. It would be a massive error to go cheap here, massive and selfish, and the world, i.e, the cognoscenti, the foreign press, etc would look at NYC and its population in its entirety as if it were insane, miserly or negligent. I for one won't be personally affected, as spires in any form do not wet my whistle, so to speak. I'm more of a roof person, therefore I will probably just admire the building itself and discount the needle on top as a mere after-thought, a lingering monument to greed and stinginess, the paucity of good aesthetic taste and to a complete and utter lack of proper foresight/due diligence. What a clusterf***, pardon my french.

Roadcruiser1
May 24, 2012, 11:01 PM
Why Do We Have To Wait Until Late Year if the base is ready for glass now?
I'd give my own assumption and say it wills start early June.

It's not ready. They haven't finished the concrete work, and they need to put non structural steel to change the current Chinese takeout box shape of the base to a square base similar to the bases on the former Twin Towers. Then the base glass will go up.

chris123678
May 24, 2012, 11:53 PM
It's not ready. They haven't finished the concrete work, and they need to put non structural steel to change the current Chinese takeout box shape of the base to a square base similar to the bases on the former Twin Towers. Then the base glass will go up.

Then what's with that stuff hanging out the spaces between the windows of floor 20? I don't see why they don't do the upper portion first while they work on the lobby portion.
I'm just a little hyped about the base glass because i know this tower will look great with it.

NYC=WTC
May 25, 2012, 12:42 AM
Then what's with that stuff hanging out the spaces between the windows of floor 20? I don't see why they don't do the upper portion first while they work on the lobby portion.
I'm just a little hyped about the base glass because i know this tower will look great with it.

Relax, hold your horses :haha: There is no more concrete work on the base, it has already been poured and cured. That goes for the foundation work as well. What they are probably doing now behind that black netting is installing support anchors for the cladding of the base. :yes::yes::yes:

chris123678
May 25, 2012, 1:07 AM
Relax, hold your horses :haha: There is no more concrete work on the base, it has already been poured and cured. That goes for the foundation work as well. What they are probably doing now behind that black netting is installing support anchors for the cladding of the base. :yes::yes::yes:
Cool. Thanks For Explaining, but a pic posted by pnnapp1 and the anchors and brackets were all in.

Roadcruiser1
May 25, 2012, 2:17 AM
Cool. Thanks For Explaining, but a pic posted by pnnapp1 and the anchors and brackets were all in.

I highly doubt you will even get to see it in farther detail due to the black net. So -_-...

chris123678
May 25, 2012, 2:41 AM
I highly doubt you will even get to see it in farther detail due to the black net. So -_-...

Why Wouldn't they take the black net off?

Roadcruiser1
May 25, 2012, 4:03 AM
Why Wouldn't they take the black net off?

I am certain they will be working back there and they need protection.

WTCman7301
May 25, 2012, 4:27 AM
I am certain they will be working back there and they need protection.

How will they slide the glass in, it would be too tight for the workers to slide the glass in.

chris123678
May 25, 2012, 4:33 AM
I am certain they will be working back there and they need protection.

Well Just Have To Wait and See. I think they will take the netting of though.

Thanks For The Info.

CassGilbert
May 25, 2012, 4:53 AM
Those are some incredible pictures on the previous page. Can't wait for it to be finished. How will the observation deck compare to the one on the Twin Towers? I've been up there around 1998.

NYguy
May 25, 2012, 7:08 AM
Those are some incredible pictures on the previous page. Can't wait for it to be finished. How will the observation deck compare to the one on the Twin Towers?
I've been up there around 1998.

The views will be similar, yet at different angles. The observation deck itself will offer a different experience from the original, but it's basically the same thing - you go up, you look down.


BryceLee (http://www.flickr.com/photos/13546200@N02/7125323463/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8023/7125323463_edcfff4d23_b.jpg



Donald Morrison (http://www.flickr.com/photos/709913/7262390550/sizes/h/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8153/7262390550_12d7e6af8f_h.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7219/7262364772_aab2fc76d9_h.jpg



Quentin F. Le Fevre (http://www.flickr.com/photos/79198082@N06/7264559412/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8027/7264559412_71bd9b6e06_b.jpg



Theasijtsma (http://www.flickr.com/photos/theasijtsma/7264285340/sizes/h/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7079/7264285340_583ccf6804_h.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8011/7265014500_53a9fe818c_h.jpg



Sean P. Sweeney (http://www.flickr.com/photos/sean_sweeney/7259740272/sizes/l/in/photostream/)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7240/7259740272_3283e27858_b.jpg



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7240/7259740272_61982625c7_h.jpg

NYguy
May 25, 2012, 9:20 AM
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/world_trade_center_offers_warm_welcome_98qnSJ2LCfZ3KTpBFJpTSJ

1 World Trade Center offers warm welcome

http://www.nypost.com/rw/nypost/2012/05/25/business/web_photos/25.1f031.1wtc1c--300x300.jpg

By STEVE CUOZZO
May 25, 2012



While bickering goes on over the iconic office tower’s crown, its street-level face is just as vital — not only to Condé Nast employees who will move in by 2015, but to the millions of visitors to the 16-acre WTC site. The “podium” design by Skidmore Owings & Merrill is the end product of a tortured history that included the dumping of an earlier scheme over costs and fears its custom-fabricated glass would too easily shatter.

The new image released by the skyscraper’s owners, the Port Authority and the Durst Organization, shows for the first time how its fortified base — a cube 185-feet on each side — will look to people arriving for work.

Preliminary renderings last year suggested a monolithic, corporate-looking wall despite a supposed “pleated” effect. But the image shown here promises a warmer welcome. It is articulated by vertical glass fins protruding from panels of stainless steel slates. The fins will be arrayed in patterns that will vary as they move up the facade. Perforated aluminum screens behind the steel slates will be illuminated, making the entire tower podium glow by night — a suitable companion to the lit-up base of 7 World Trade Center nearby.


http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/143558681/large.jpg

JACKinBeantown
May 25, 2012, 10:14 AM
^ Nice. And hey, the Post got the name right.

cityenthusiast
May 25, 2012, 12:50 PM
:previous: Thats awesome I'm much more excited for the completion of the base now. Im glad they chose that design. Now i just hope they come to their senses about the spire

mrnyc
May 25, 2012, 2:18 PM
yeah glad they finally released this, but no surprises here. i always figured the base was going to reflect 7wtc. thats ok with me.

O-tacular
May 25, 2012, 4:33 PM
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/world_trade_center_offers_warm_welcome_98qnSJ2LCfZ3KTpBFJpTSJ

1 World Trade Center offers warm welcome

http://www.nypost.com/rw/nypost/2012/05/25/business/web_photos/25.1f031.1wtc1c--300x300.jpg

By STEVE CUOZZO
May 25, 2012




http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/143558681/large.jpg
I'm confused. Will the base now be straight as opposed to angling upward?

hunser
May 25, 2012, 4:39 PM
A bit old... originally posted by germantower on SSC:

http://i50.tinypic.com/2pqjn1y.jpg

Shabdro Photo (http://www.flickr.com/photos/shabdro/6947715192/in/faves-markluethi/)

Zapatan
May 25, 2012, 4:54 PM
I'm confused. Will the base now be straight as opposed to angling upward?


Yea they changed it.

Yankee fan for life
May 25, 2012, 5:26 PM
At lest the podium had a descent design changed.

Eidolon
May 25, 2012, 5:29 PM
At lest the podium had a descent design changed.

This. I actually prefer this design over the previous one. :banana:

JayPro
May 25, 2012, 5:48 PM
Just a shot in the dark; but could it be that this whole kerfuffle with the spire is related to this? I mean once they evaluate the base (espscially as it is per these renderings), maybe they can figure out if the radome is feasible coast-wise.

What I'm triying to say is that on second look they might have enough funds to clad the spire again....maybe not as before, but at least in something.

Maybe?

Hudson11
May 25, 2012, 6:01 PM
What I'm triying to say is that on second look they might have enough funds to clad the spire again....maybe not as before, but at least in something.

Maybe?

it's mostly a maintenance thing, the radome would make the spire difficult to maintain. Maybe if it's redesigned.


I'm confused. Will the base now be straight as opposed to angling upward?

correct.

http://ny.curbed.com/uploads/before%20and%20after%201WTC%20base.jpg
curbed NY (http://ny.curbed.com/places/1-world-trade-center)

RockMont
May 25, 2012, 6:12 PM
I actually like the one on the right better. So, sometimes changes are for the better. Unlike the spire, the facade of the podium will be better, just like the design of all of the buildings is better than the original Leibeskind fiasco.

NewYorkDominates
May 25, 2012, 6:23 PM
^ Yeah,the one on the left looks so out of place.The new one has more of a look of the original WTC,but the old base on 1WTC had the angles like the original WTC.

O-tacular
May 25, 2012, 7:03 PM
I really like the new cladding for the base. In a sense I liked the original version for the angled corners because they mirrored the top portion of the tower. On the other hand it seems like an improvement for the pedestrian realm.

EDIT: One more question: does the added volume of the new curtain wall stay uninterrupted to the 20th floor? If so that would make for a wicked atrium.

eseninobrandon
May 25, 2012, 7:24 PM
Oh so they can pay 40 million for the new base but they can't pay 20 million for the antenna? Wtf is going on!?!?

chris123678
May 25, 2012, 7:44 PM
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7219/7262364772_aab2fc76d9_h.jpg

http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/090327-worldtradecenter-vmed-7a.grid-4x2.jpg

Looking at these two pictures, this is probably one of the few buildings that actually look like the rendering.

All credits to the owner of the top picture, these are not mine.

Again all credits to-NYGuy

StrongIsland
May 25, 2012, 8:12 PM
The only suckish thing about all this is the base is already built to support the cladding it was supposed to get. Now we pointlessly have the weird zigzag of steel that probaby would have looked cool with the base. Oh well, this design looks fantastic as well!

mrnyc
May 25, 2012, 9:26 PM
tribeca -- worth n west broadway 2day

http://i945.photobucket.com/albums/ad293/meesalikeu5/ISTANBUL/b406847e.jpg

sw5710
May 25, 2012, 9:46 PM
.......

jd3189
May 25, 2012, 9:49 PM
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/143558681/large.jpg

Looks almost like the original with more trees.
http://static.flickr.com/85/249362061_9ca82d1883_o.jpg
http://static.flickr.com/85/249362061_9ca82d1883_o.jpg

Speaking of the lobby, I believe 1 WTC will take on a much lighter version of 7 WTC's lobby

http://www.joewoolhead.com/home/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/7-WTC-Lobby1.jpg
http://www.joewoolhead.com/home/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/7-WTC-Lobby1.jpg

http://skyscrapercenter.com/images/albums/userpics/10005/WTCT1_lobby_(c)SOM.jpg
http://skyscrapercenter.com/images/albums/userpics/10005/WTCT1_lobby_(c)SOM.jpg

sw5710
May 25, 2012, 10:02 PM
morrongiello (http://www.flickr.com/photos/morrongiello/4390781952/sizes/l/) (Feb 26)

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4008/4390781952_041ae3dcc1_b.jpg[/QUOTE]

Remember when the base looked like this. Feb 2010

Zapatan
May 25, 2012, 10:44 PM
This building is beautiful, the blue is just amazing.

chris123678
May 25, 2012, 11:42 PM
The glass looks beautiful, i like it better than the first design.

With all the things occuring the base and the rendering being released, I think it's coming soon.

Otie
May 25, 2012, 11:56 PM
Installation of the fins will begin this fall ;)

chris123678
May 26, 2012, 12:45 AM
Installation of the fins will begin this fall ;)

Ok. But What's going on with that material hanging out of the 20th floor window?

ocman
May 26, 2012, 3:37 AM
It's definitely living up to the stupid designs and stupid name. Freedom looks like it's going to be fcucking uglier in reality. And proud of it's fcucking ugliness. Sorry NYC.

WTCman7301
May 26, 2012, 3:42 AM
When is the next jump for 1 WTC?

bunky
May 26, 2012, 3:52 AM
It's definitely living up to the stupid designs and stupid name. Freedom looks like it's going to be fcucking uglier in reality. And proud of it's fcucking ugliness. Sorry NYC.

Yeah, it's not called freedom tower, thanks for your opinion though bro

:gtfo2:

Duck From NY
May 26, 2012, 4:02 AM
It's definitely living up to the stupid designs and stupid name. Freedom looks like it's going to be fcucking uglier in reality. And proud of it's fcucking ugliness. Sorry NYC.
-
Wow, you must be related to Shakespeare. You have a way with words, a real charmer ;)

NewYorkDominates
May 26, 2012, 4:21 AM
[QUOTE=ocman;5713557]It's definitely living up to the stupid designs and stupid name. Freedom looks like it's going to be fcucking uglier in reality. And proud of it's fcucking ugliness. Sorry NYC.[/]

Ok,now move on.Not your type of building,no need to waste time ranting.

Silverfox
May 26, 2012, 4:22 AM
It's definitely living up to the stupid designs and stupid name. Freedom looks like it's going to be fcucking uglier in reality. And proud of it's fcucking ugliness. Sorry NYC.

You're being too negative. This building is beautiful, and glass towers in general are the way to go. They blend seamlessly with their surroundings, and the environmental efficiency of the new World Trade Center buildings is reason enough for me to embrace them. I have a feeling that buildings with glass curtain walls are going to be the norm from now on, which is a good thing.

CarlosV
May 26, 2012, 4:33 AM
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7242/7271501480_b7b9eafdfa_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7271501480/)
IMG_4457 copy (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7271501480/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

.

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7243/7271524958_a874b0a8c9_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7271524958/)
DSC_0027 copy (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceva321/7271524958/) by Ceva321 (http://www.flickr.com/people/ceva321/), on Flickr

STR
May 26, 2012, 5:51 AM
http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/4747/npc003.jpg